On Dressing Plain

A guest piece from Rob of “Con­sider the Lillies”:http://consider-the-lilies.blogspot.com/
Rob describes him­self: “I’m a twenty-something gay Mid-western expa­tri­ate liv­ing in Boston. I was inspired to begin a blog based on the writ­ings of other urban Quaker blog­gers as they reflect and dis­cuss their inward faith and out­ward expe­ri­ences. When I’m not read­ing or writ­ing, I’m usu­ally with my friends, trav­el­ing about, and/or gen­er­ally mak­ing an arse of myself.”


As of late, I’ve been led to con­sider my out­ward appear­ance and how I choose to dress. With­out elab­o­rat­ing on that lead­ing in this post­ing (per­haps later), I have given much thought to cloth­ing and dress gen­er­ally. How we dress com­mu­ni­cates a great deal to oth­ers about ourselves—whether or not it’s our inten­tion.
The vain among us put a great deal of empha­sis on our clothes and obsess about what it may say to oth­ers about our phys­i­cal or social traits: “Am I hot, or am I not? Do I look smart with these glasses? Do these pants make my butt look big?” The secretly vain (per­haps every­one else) tend to avoid the topic lest they might have to inwardly admit that they are in the for­mer cat­e­gory. Even if we tell our­selves that we don’t mean to com­mu­ni­cate much of any­thing by our attire, it’s cer­tainly true that oth­ers under­stand our clothes to be say­ing some­thing about us. Let us begin the con­ver­sa­tion there to avoid deter­min­ing whether we are out­right vain or just secretly vain. :)
Cloth­ing com­mu­ni­cates many things about us includ­ing per­cep­tions of age, sex, class, and wealth. Cloth­ing can stereo­type us as urban or rural; cool or uncool (a sub­jec­tive mea­sure, of course); hip or hope­lessly out of fash­ion. Some exam­ples: when I wear my best suit to work, I sense that I get a higher level of respect than when I dress more casu­ally. When I go out for a night on the town, I pick my “New York” shoes to con­vey a cer­tain cos­mopoli­tan image. Also, when I wear my coat col­lar stand­ing up, it says some­thing dif­fer­ent than when I wear my col­lar flat. In what instances do you dress dif­fer­ently to empha­size a dif­fer­ent part of your­self?
On evenings and week­ends, I tend to wear the same clothes: a logo-free long-sleeve shirt, cor­duroy pants and a pair of retro-like sneak­ers. I do it because it’s com­fort­able and it’s easy; I always know what to wear, and I get to avoid the dreaded deed of shopping—something I really dis­like. (It also means that I do laun­dry more often!)
Even though I tend to wear that same set of clothes out­side of work, that deci­sion says more than that I sim­ply don’t care that my clothes are always the same. The out­fit com­mu­ni­cates a great deal more: One is just as likely to see a man wear­ing cords, retro sneak­ers and a logo-free long-sleeve shirt as one is a woman. Per­haps my clothes com­mu­ni­cate androg­yny. Maybe they say that I’m an urban dweller—a lit­tle bit of a hip­ster, but not too much. Per­haps they say that I’m cheap. What­ever they com­mu­ni­cate, I think it’s fair to say that they say some­thing to oth­ers. Once I admit that my clothes indeed say some­thing, I can get past my dis­com­fort (I must be secretly vain) and talk about it openly. Who is the per­son that I’m called to be and how am I out­wardly led to embody those qual­i­ties? Through actions, yes, but through dress?
Plain dress, while a state­ment in and of itself, com­mu­ni­cates faith, com­mit­ment to that faith, and Oth­er­ness. It set a per­son apart dif­fer­ently than other forms of dress. When prompted by an inner spir­i­tual lead­ing, plain dress isn’t sim­ply the other side of the “cool coin.” It doesn’t vary by day or cir­cum­stance, and to some, plain dress is rather ugly. How­ever, plain dress stands for some­thing much dif­fer­ent than a rejec­tion of our cul­tural ideals of beauty and viril­ity. It is an embrace of one’s inner spirit and mak­ing that spirit and that faith an out­ward sym­bol.
To me, plain dress would serve as a daily reminder of a com­mit­ment to lead a more Chris­t­ian and Quaker life. If I were to dress plain, I would have to sac­ri­fice my cool­ness (for lack of a bet­ter word) and wear plain, and rather unex­cit­ing clothes. I wouldn’t have the lux­ury of dress­ing for dif­fer­ent audi­ences and cir­cum­stances depend­ing on my moti­va­tions. In essence, I would out­wardly com­mu­ni­cate that I am a Quaker first, a per­son liv­ing each moment in the spirit and in the Light, and every­thing else sec­ond. Plain dress would serve as a reminder to me and oth­ers that I aspire to live toward God and in the foot­steps of Jesus in all places, at all times, and in every cir­cum­stance.
What an empow­er­ing thought! It is a tremen­dous lead­ing for any­one to hear and one worth seek­ing greater discernment.


This piece orig­i­nally appeared on the “Con­sider the Lil­lies” blog on Sec­ond Month 15 as the post “On Dress­ing Plain”:http://consider-the-lilies.blogspot.com/2005/02/on-dressing-plain.html.
*See also:* “Quaker plain dress resources”:http://www.nonviolence.org/Quaker/plain_dress.php, a col­lec­tion of con­tem­po­rary sto­ries and links on plain dress.

  • http://journals.aol.com/hestiahomeschool/HomeschoolingJournal/ Kas Ridi­man

    I am new to being a Friend. What exactly would con­sti­tute Plain dress­ing? I rarely wear any­thing but jeans and tshirts…

  • http://ofthebest.blogspot.com Amanda

    Hi Kas -
    One of the most nicely orga­nized overviews of Quaker Plain dress is at Quaker Jane’s site. She describes “dif­fer­ent lev­els of plain” — your jeans and t-shirts would likely fall into the “sim­ple dress” catagory.
    Wel­come to being a Quaker! :)

  • http://www.nonviolence.org/martink Mar­tin Kelley

    Hi Kas,
    My answer to “what’s plain dress­ing?” is “how­ever you’re led to dress.” I do have “more to say”:http://​www​.non​vi​o​lence​.org/​m​a​r​t​i​n​k​/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​0​0​0​0​8​0​.​php but the first prin­ci­ple is that this isn’t a uni­form to be adopted so you’ll fit in, but instead a reflec­tion of lead­ings and prompt­ings from the Holy Spirit. See the
    “Quaker plain dress”:http://​www​.non​vi​o​lence​.org/​q​u​a​k​e​r​/​p​l​a​i​n​_​d​r​e​s​s​.​php page on this site for a whole range of sto­ries and definitions.

  • Jonathan

    My idea of plain­ness would be bet­ter under­stood by using the term modest-dress. I think that peo­ple should avoid too much expense when buy­ing clothes, spend­ing friv­o­lous amounts of money on cloth­ing and being seen drip­ping in designer labels from head to toe will cause peo­ple to ques­tion your sin­cer­ity and faith­ful­ness. The mes­sage: do not let money be your god.
    Your clothes should not reflect your dis­pos­able income or sta­tus. Clothes are worn for a basic pur­pose, to keep us warm and give us dig­nity and a decent appear­ance. They should not be barom­e­ters of wealth or mere fash­ion state­ments. Nei­ther should they be too bright and colour­ful, or too skimpy. Cloth­ing should cover provoca­tive areas like cleav­age and legs.
    Avoid wear­ing too much jew­ellery, it is incred­i­bly vul­gar to wear too much and will imply a mate­ri­al­is­tic or vain tem­pera­ment. Remem­ber, the only pos­ses­sions that Christ ever had were a pair of san­dals and the clothes on his back. Stick to a sim­ple wed­ding ring (a plain gold band is best) and a pair of mod­est ear­rings or studs (not the long, dan­gly kind). The final item that you COULD add to this list is per­haps an ele­gant pearl neck­lace for evening wear. This should be the most jew­ellery that you should own, you should not need any more than this. Any­thing else is sim­ply van­ity.
    As regards the wear­ing of cos­met­ics, the woman who wears make-up today is no longer a fallen woman or a devi­ous temptress, but she should still exer­cise cau­tion. A light, sim­ple make-up is the way to go. Just a lit­tle foun­da­tion sealed with a light dust­ing of face pow­der, a quick swish of blush, a dab of neau­tral brown eye shadow on the eye­lids and the mer­est hint of brown or black mas­cara for def­i­n­i­tion, a final slick of lip­stick in a basic shade com­pletes the look. Avoid frosty or glit­tery ‘fash­ion shades’ of lip­stick. Stick with a clear red or a plum pink. Never wear too much make-up, a face caked with cos­met­ics has an arti­fi­cial look and loses char­ac­ter. It also hides the indi­vid­ual under­neath all of that make-up. For many women going com­pletely barefaced may be an option, if you have the con­fi­dence to do this. A face with­out cos­met­ics can look fan­tas­tic if skin is in good con­di­tion, you will also save money from not hav­ing to pay out for expen­sive make-up all the time.
    Being plain does not mean hav­ing to be a washed-out, whey-faced wall­flower. You have the option of wear­ing taste­fully cho­sen and very lightly applied cos­met­ics. If you are not very good at ‘doing your face’ how­ever, I think you should avoid wear­ing base and sim­ply apply a quick brush of mas­cara and a quick smudge of lip­stick. This will make you look pre­sentable with­out appear­ing immod­est or flashy. You can also scrub your face bare and show off your God-given face to the world, if you dare.
    #Just a lit­tle advice from a quiet, Eng­lish Quaker hop­ing to be of service.