Quaker Ranter Rotating Header Image

Opening Doors and Moving on Up

Friends Gen­eral Con­fer­ence has announced that Barry Crossno will be their new incom­ing Gen­eral Sec­re­tary. Old time blog­gers will remem­ber him as the blog­ger behind The Quaker Dharma. FGC’s just pub­lished an inter­view with him and one of the ques­tions is about his blog­ging past. Here’s part of the answer:

Blog­ging among Friends is very impor­tant.  There are not a lot of Quak­ers.  We’re spread out across the world.  Blog­ging opens up dia­logues that just wouldn’t hap­pen oth­er­wise.  While I laid down my blog, “The Quaker Dharma,” a few years ago, and my think­ing on some issues has evolved since then, I’m clear that blog­ging is what allowed me to give voice to my call.  It helped open some of the doors that led me to work for Pen­dle Hill and, now by exten­sion, FGC.  A lot of cut­ting edge Quaker thought is being shared through blogs.

I thought it might be use­ful to fill in a lit­tle bit of this story. If you go read­ing through the back com­ments on Barry’s blog you’ll see it’s a time machine into the early Quaker blog­ging com­mu­nity. I first posted about his blog in Feb­ru­ary of 2005 with Quaker Dharma: Let the Light Shine and I high­lighted him reg­u­larly (March, April, June) until the proto-QuakerQuaker “Blog Watch” started run­ning. There I fea­tured him twice that June and twice more in August, the most active period of his blogging.

It’s nos­tal­gic to look through the com­menters: Joe G., Peter­son Toscano, Mitchell San­tine Gould, Dave Carl, Bar­bara Q, Robin M, Brandice (Quaker Mon­key), Eric Muhr, Nancy A… There were some good dis­cus­sions. Barry’s most exu­ber­ant post was Let’s Begin, and LizOpp and I espe­cially labored with him to ground what was a very clear and obvi­ous lead­ing by hook­ing up with other Friends locally and nation­ally who were inter­ested in these efforts. I offered my help in hook­ing him up with FGC  and he wrote back “If you know peo­ple at other Quaker orga­ni­za­tions that you wish me to speak to and coor­di­nate with or pos­si­bly work for, I will.”

And that’s what I did. My super­vi­sor, FGC Devel­op­ment head Michael Wajda, was plan­ning a trip to Texas and I started talk­ing up Barry Crossno. I had a hunch they’d like each other. I told Michael that Barry had a lot of expe­ri­ence and a very clear lead­ing but needed to spend some time grow­ing as a Quaker–an incu­ba­tion period, if you will, among grounded Friends. In the first part of the FGC inter­view he mov­ingly talks about the ground­ing his time at Pen­dle Hill has given him.

The Quaker Dharma: Thank YouIn Octo­ber 2006 he announced he was clos­ing a blog that had become largely dor­mant. It’s worth quot­ing that first for­mal goodbye:

I want to thank those of you who chose to actively par­tic­i­pate. I learned a lot through our exchanges and I think there were many peo­ple who ben­e­fited from many of the posts you left. On a purely per­sonal note, I learned that it’s good to tem­per my need to GO DO NOW. Some of you really helped men­tor me con­cern­ing effec­tively lis­ten­ing to guid­ance and help­ing me under­stand that act­ing locally may be bet­ter than try­ing to take on the whole world at once.

I also want to share that I met some peo­ple and made con­tacts through this process that have opened tremen­dous doors for me and my abil­ity to put myself in ser­vice to oth­ers. For this I am deeply grate­ful. I feel sure that some of these ties will live on past the clos­ing of the Quaker Dharma.

Those of you famil­iar with pieces like The Lost Quaker Gen­er­a­tion and Pass­ing the Faith, Planet of the Quak­ers Style know I’ve long been wor­ried that we’ve not doing a good job iden­ti­fy­ing, sup­port­ing and retain­ing vision­ary new Friends. Around 2004 I stopped com­plain­ing (mostly) and just started look­ing for oth­ers who also held this con­cern. The online orga­niz­ing has spilled over into real world con­fer­ences and work­shops and is much big­ger than one web­site or small group. Now we see “grad­u­ates” of this net­work start­ing to take on real-world responsibilities.

Barry’s a bright guy with a strong lead­ing and a healthy ambi­tion. He would have cer­tainly made some­thing of him­self with­out the blogs and the “doors” opened up by myself and oth­ers. But it would have cer­tainly taken him longer to crack the Philadel­phia scene and I think it very likely that FGC would have announced a dif­fer­ent Gen­eral Sec­re­tary this week if it weren’t for the blogs.

Quak­erQuaker almost cer­tainly has more future Gen­eral Sec­re­taries in its mem­ber­ship rolls. But it would be a shame to focus on that or to imply that the pin­na­cle of a Quaker lead­ing is mov­ing to Philadel­phia. Many parts of the Quaker world are already too enthralled by it’s staff lists. What we need is to extend a cul­ture of every­day Friends ready to boldly exclaim the Good News–to love God and their neigh­bor and to leap with joy by the pres­ence of the Inward Christ. Friends’ cul­ture shouldn’t focus on staffing, flashy pro­grams or fundrais­ing hype.  At the end of the day, spir­i­tual out­reach is a one-on-one activ­ity. It’s peo­ple spend­ing the time to find one another, share their spir­i­tual jour­ney and share oppor­tu­ni­ties to grow in their faith.

Quak­erQuaker has evolved a lot since 2005. It now has a team of edi­tors, dis­cus­sion boards, Face­book and Twit­ter streams, and the site itself reaches over 100,000 read­ers a year. But it’s still about find­ing each other and encour­ag­ing each other. I think we’ve proven that these over­lap­ping, dis­trib­uted, largely-unfunded online ini­tia­tives can play a crit­i­cal out­reach role for the Soci­ety of Friends. What would it look like for the “old style” Quaker orga­ni­za­tions to start sup­port­ing inde­pen­dent Quaker social media? And how could our net­works rein­vig­o­rate cash-strapped Quaker orga­ni­za­tions with fresh faces and new mod­els of com­mu­ni­ca­tion? Those are ques­tions for another post.

  • Chris Mohr

    Thanks for the news and the thought­ful reflec­tion, Mar­tin. Well said.

  • Barry Crossno

    Hi Mar­tin:

    Thank you so much for this post. I was think­ing about you and this larger his­tory you’ve shared as I was answer­ing those inter­view ques­tions for Chris Pifer. I’m grate­ful you cov­ered this.

    I want to pub­licly say thank you for con­nect­ing me to Michael Wajda and FGC. My intro­duc­tion to Michael and the FGC Devel­op­ment Com­mit­tee led me to serve on FGC Cen­tral Com­mit­tee and to also become a Quaker Quest travel team mem­ber. Later, it was Michael who first took me to Pen­dle Hill for spir­i­tual nur­ture. That visit in turn led to my employ­ment at Pen­dle Hill. Your hunch to con­nect me to Michael proved pre­scient and life chang­ing. Yes, my road to where I am now would have been longer with­out blog­ging and with­out the sup­port, ground­ing and con­nec­tions extended to me by peo­ple like you, Liz Opp and many oth­ers. Thanks. Also, I wish to share that the “now” I’m refer­ring to is a place where I feel more grounded in our prac­tices and I can live into my call. The fact that liv­ing into this call led me to be named as the next Gen­eral Sec­re­tary of FGC was a sur­prise in many ways. It was not the goal. Serv­ing God was and is the goal. But, I hope becom­ing Gen­eral Sec­re­tary is an out­come that serves the good of many peo­ple and that I do this work grounded in Spirit.

    I also want to sup­port your obser­va­tion that “At the end of the day, spir­i­tual out­reach is a one-on-one activ­ity. It’s peo­ple spend­ing the time to find one another, share their spir­i­tual jour­ney and share oppor­tu­ni­ties to grow in their faith.” Yes, it’s the com­mu­nity that we build with one another that really mat­ters. I hope in my time at FGC I can work with staff, the board, vol­un­teers, and all sorts of Quaker com­mu­ni­ties to help pro­vide the tools, pro­grams and oppor­tu­ni­ties for peo­ple to grow fur­ther in their faith jour­ney by reach­ing out to one another. I love how online media has already helped sup­port this process for so many peo­ple and I look for­ward to how online media might be used in the future. With this in mind, I hope you will post soon concerning:

    What would it look like for the “old style” Quaker orga­ni­za­tions to start sup­port­ing inde­pen­dent Quaker social media? And how could our net­works rein­vig­o­rate cash-strapped Quaker orga­ni­za­tions with fresh faces and new mod­els of com­mu­ni­ca­tion? Those are ques­tions for another post.”

    With appre­ci­a­tion,

    Barry Crossno

    • http://www.martinkelley.com Mar­tin Kelley

      Hi Barry: It’s great to see you here. I was hop­ing you might drop back into the blo­gos­phere! Hope it’s not too strange to be a pub­lic fig­ure that peo­ple talk about.

      On the sup­port side, I’ll start off with the most obvi­ous answer: encour­age FGC pro­grams to use the Quaker Ad Net­work. For FGC it’s a great way to reach tens of thou­sands of peo­ple with your mes­sage. The book­store, the Gath­er­ing, pub­li­ca­tions and job searches should all really be using it.

      I’m hop­ing that Quak­er­Ads can grow to sup­port a wider social media ecosys­tem. When I con­sider the time I put into it I’m maybe mak­ing min­i­mum wage (I con­sider it a form of mar­ket­ing for my social media con­sult­ing busi­ness). The real bene­fac­tors are the blog­gers. Right now we have one (Wess Daniels) as a test, but as we get more busi­ness I hope to add many many more. By year’s end, I’d love to see dozens of blog­gers mak­ing any­where from $20-$200 a month. One of the neater social media projects right now is Quak​ermaps​.com and while they’re still not on Quak­er­Ads (I bug Micah and Jon fairly con­stantly), it’s an exam­ple of an incred­i­bly use­ful inde­pen­dent ser­vice that doesn’t need a big bud­get. FGC could give real sup­port to these sorts of projects by using QuakerAds–and of course, you’d be reach­ing a wide audi­ence and gen­er­at­ing a lot of atten­tion and good will among bloggers.

      I’ll share one more con­cern. Right now, with one excep­tion, I can’t think of any­one active in blog­ging or Quaker social media who’s on the staff of FGC, PYM, Pen­dle Hill or AFSC (PYM’s Stephen Dot­son has just started a YAF net­work on Face­book). That’s wor­rysome. There’s no bridges. There’s no one who would have known your blog who is hav­ing weekly staff meet­ings in anyone’s office. I can only spec­u­late on the cause: orga­ni­za­tions aren’t hir­ing the right peo­ple or maybe staffers are wor­ried about their jobs if they’re too active (there was that one guy back in 2006…). I tried to light a fire with PYM a few months ago but that appar­ently landed on rocky soil.

      What­ever the rea­son, as Gen­eral Sec­re­tary of FGC you could encour­age more active engage­ment. I know FGC is work­ing on a six-figure com­mu­ni­ca­tions mas­ter plan but you can’t throw money at what’s needed. The most expen­sive, cutting-edge web­site in the world won’t change the cul­ture or break down the wall between staff and inde­pen­dent Quaker social media. You’d be bet­ter off rebuild­ing FGC​Quaker​.org in Blogspot and telling staff that if they want to keep their jobs they all have to post some­thing once a week. I’m being com­pletely seri­ous here. I doubt that’s on the table, but I do see fun­da­men­tal changes hap­pen­ing in how Friends com­mu­ni­cate, changes that will affect how we orga­nize. The insti­tu­tions that learn how to engage and adapt will be the ones that staff most relevant.

  • Alice Y.

    Look­ing for­ward to that other post you men­tion in the last para­graph. :)

    • http://www.martinkelley.com Mar­tin Kelley

      Yeah, I’m not sure… The most nat­ural form would be shar­ing leaked doc­u­ments, decon­struct­ing back­ass­ward atti­tudes and cri­tiquing cur­rent web­sites that are doing things wrong. I’ve grown tame in my old age, or maybe it’s Chris­t­ian mercy. What­ever, I’m more inter­ested in lift­ing up the indi­vid­u­als and groups where I see fresh life.

      I was hav­ing an inter­est­ing chat yes­ter­day with a fel­low blog­ger. We were talk­ing about apos­tasy (!) and social media and the con­clu­sion I came to was the orga­ni­za­tions that have their eyes on the prize–I’d say the good news of Christ’s pres­ence in our lives, but really it could be any strong vision for themselves–will be focused out­ward, open to fresh peo­ple and new ideas. They won’t be stingy about link­ing to fel­low work­ers in the field. They’ll know that their com­peti­tors aren’t the fundrais­ing team in the next office, but a cul­ture of indif­fer­ence and triv­i­al­ity that pres­sures Friends and would-be Friends to care more about tran­sient fluff than their own spir­i­tual state. The Holy Spirit wins when we take the time to care about “unim­por­tant” peo­ple (an iso­lated blog­ger in Dal­las circa 2005) or to build up the church by help­ing oth­ers in their min­istry even when it doesn’t advance our career or bring money to our organization’s fundrais­ing cam­paign. The Reli­gious Soci­ety of Friends is a move­ment led by the Spirit, to which our orga­ni­za­tions are sim­ply ser­vants. Those with cul­tures that under­stand this won’t have any prob­lems being relevant.

  • Joe G.

    I real­ize this is not about me, but I’ll make it about me any­way. I can’t believe I’m still get­ting a shout-out on Quak­erQuaker. I’m both hum­bled and impressed (with myself).

    And I remem­ber the blog “The Quaker Dharma”, too. I can’t believe that guy is the new Gen­eral Sec­re­tary of FGC, whose not half bad look­ing, if I might be so bold, and I will be anyway…maybe I’ll rethink return­ing to Quakerism…

    Seri­ously, I may not have much inter­est in reli­gion these days, but I always val­ued the Friendly blog­ging com­mu­nity I once was a part of, and you helped con­nect me to it, and build and main­tain it. Thanks so much for your fel­low­ship and the excel­lent work that you con­tinue to do.