Jul 07

Is dairy overrated?

None other than the NYTimes’s Mark Bittman sounds like a vegan polemi­cist:

Most humans never tasted fresh milk from any source other than their mother for almost all of human his­tory, and fresh cow’s milk could not be rou­tinely avail­able to urban­ites with­out indus­trial pro­duc­tion. The fed­eral gov­ern­ment not only sup­ports the milk indus­try by spend­ing more money on dairy than any other item in the school lunch pro­gram, but by con­tribut­ing free pro­pa­ganda as well as sub­si­dies amount­ing to well over $4 bil­lion in the last 10 years.

These aren’t new argu­ments, but Bittman presents them well, cit­ing his own expe­ri­ences. And of course it makes a dif­fer­ence that he’s a charm­ing, high pro­file Times columnist.

Oct 21

Becky Thomas Ankeny’s recent message at George Fox University via Wess Danie…

Becky Thomas Ankeny’s recent mes­sage at George Fox Uni­ver­sity via Wess Daniels

Reshared post from +C. Wess Daniels

Becky Thomas Ankeny’s mes­sage at George Fox Chapel yes­ter­day is beau­ti­ful litany of God’s call to all peo­ple. It is espe­cially meant for those who grew up in a reli­gious culture/church who told you that you can­not minister.

Embed­ded Link

George Fox Uni­ver­sity Chapel — GFU Chapel
One Moment Please. Con­nect­ing to iTunes U. Load­ing. George Fox Uni­ver­sity Chapel. GFU Chapel. We are unable to find iTunes on your com­puter. If iTunes doesn’t open, click the iTunes appli­ca­tion ic…

Google+: View post on Google+

Mar 21

Must read: G/localization: When Global Information and Local Interaction Collide

Read
a fab­u­lous arti­cle last night and this morn­ing by Diana Boyd, a PhD
stu­dent at UC-Berkeley and a researcher at Yahoo! Research Berke­ley.
She’s writ­ing about the inter­ac­tions of cul­ture and tech­nol­ogy and it
speaks a lot to some of the online and offline con­ver­sa­tions I’ve been
hav­ing lately.

Here’s the link: G/localization: When Global Infor­ma­tion and Local Inter­ac­tion Col­lide. And here are some snip­pets to entice you to fol­low it:

On cul­ture:

When mass media began, peo­ple assumed that we would all
con­verge upon one global cul­ture. While the media has had an effect,
com­plete homog­e­niza­tion has not occurred. And it will not. While some
val­ues spread and are adopted en-masse, cul­tures form within the mass
cul­ture to dif­fer­en­ti­ate smaller groups of peo­ple. Style-driven
sub­cul­tures are the most vis­i­ble form of this, but it occurs in
com­pa­nies and in other social gatherings.

Techies will like her take on “embed­ded observers”:

While the cre­ators have visions of what they think would
be cool, they do not con­struct unmov­able roadmaps well into the future.
They are con­stantly react­ing to what’s going on, adding new fea­tures as
needed. The code on these sites changes con­stantly, not just once a
quar­ter. The design­ers try out fea­tures and watch how they get used. If
no one is inter­ested, that’s fine — they’ll just make some­thing new.
They are all deeply in touch with what peo­ple are actu­ally doing, why
and how it man­i­fests itself on the site.

On online communities:

Dig­i­tal com­mu­nity par­tic­i­pants some­times find that they
“acci­den­tally” meet some­one. Peo­ple col­lide on Flickr because they took
sim­i­lar pho­tos; the find won­der­ful blogs through search. These ad-hoc
inter­ac­tions typ­i­cally occur because peo­ple are pro­duc­ing mate­r­ial that
can be stum­bled across, either through search or brows­ing. They may not
intend for the mate­r­ial to be con­sumed beyond the intended audi­ence,
but they also don’t see a rea­son to pre­vent it. In essence, they are
invit­ing moments of syn­chronic­ity. And syn­chronic­ity is energizing.