Apr 05

YFNA Reunion and Camp

My friend Peter Blood is part of a group orga­niz­ing a “Young Friends North Amer­ica camp”:www.quakersong.org/quakercamp in Bar­nesville, Ohio this June and he asked that I help get word out about it. The first few days are a reunion for not-so-young-anymore Friends (YFNA more or less wound down in the late 1990s). The sec­ond part is the camp, which hopes “to bring together Friends from all branches of Quak­erism, to share what Spirit-led Quak­erism is about at its core–and to expe­ri­ence it together.” Check out the “Camp’s schedule”:http://www.quakersong.org/quakercamp_schedule/index.php for details on what this looks like.
The handy-dandy Friends His­tor­i­cal Dic­tio­nary says YFNA started in the mid-1950s. I’ve heard enough sto­ries (and met some YFNA cou­ples) to know it was a very impor­tant touch­stone for a few gen­er­a­tions of young Friends. I’ve been involved in a cou­ple of failed YFNA resus­ci­ta­tion attempts over the last few years and can’t tell you why none of them took. It could be eco­nom­ics (high gas prices and high col­lege loans keep­ing most 20-somethings from being too free-range) or sim­ple demo­graph­ics (too few Gen X Friends). Per­haps other events like the FGC Gath­er­ing ful­filled the young Quaker hook-up func­tion well enough.
What­ever the rea­son, I’m glad to see that reunion is tied into a free-form camp that doesn’t seem to be try­ing to be a YFNA orga­niz­ing meet­ing (at this point reviv­ing YFNA has the same empty guf­faw punch as the kids now nos­tal­gi­cally call­ing them­selves the “new SDS”:http://www.studentsforademocraticsociety.org/). It seems like there’s more Quaker youth orga­niz­ing going on, which is great, and I hope the camp helps that momen­tum.
Update: I’ve put up an “YFNA Reunion/Camp”:http://www.quakerquaker.org/events/2007-yfna/index.php page up over in the events sec­tion of Quak­erQuaker to fol­low any of the blog chat­ter about the gathering.

Nov 12

A Military Draft Would be Good for Us

From Johann Christoph Arnold, a “provoca­tive argu­ment that a mil­i­tary draft might not be a bad idea”:www.nonviolence.org/articles/1003-arnold.php. “Decid­ing which side to stand on is one of life’s most vital skills. It forces you to test your own con­vic­tions, to assess your per­sonal integrity and your char­ac­ter as an indi­vid­ual.“
It’s a pretty dras­tic wish. I don’t really wish it on today’s youn­gins’ (I’m not sure Arnold is quite con­vinced either). But I will give a snip­pet of my own per­sonal story, since it’s kind of appro­pri­ate to the issue: when I was a senior in high school my father des­per­ately wanted me to attend the U.S. Naval Acad­emy. I went on inter­views and even took the first phys­i­cal. The pres­sure to join was sort of akin to the pres­sure young peo­ple of ear­lier gen­er­a­tions have faced with a mil­i­tary draft (except more per­sonal, as I was essen­tially liv­ing with the chair of the draft Mar­tin Kel­ley board). I was forced to really think hard about what I believed. I had to rec­on­cile my romati­cism about the navy with my gut instincts that fight­ing was never a real solu­tion. My father’s pres­sure made me real­ize I was a paci­fist. With my deci­sion to forego the Naval Acad­emy made, I started ask­ing myself what other ram­i­fi­ca­tions fol­lowed from my peace stance. Almost twenty years, here’s Non​vi​o​lence​.org.
Arnold’s argu­ment, right or wrong, does reflect my story:
bq. A draft would present every young per­son with a choice between two paths, both of which require courage: either to heed the call of mil­i­tary duty and be rushed off to war, or to say, “No, I will give my life in the ser­vice of peace.”