In late January 2004, I went to a gathering on “Quaker Faith and Practice: The Witness of Our Lives and Words,” co-sponsored by the Christian Friends Conference and the New Foundation Fellowship. Here are some thoughts about the meeting.
Quaker Ranter
A Weekly Newsletter and Blog from Martin Kelley
Tag Archives ⇒ london
Blueprint for a Mess, the planning behind the U.S. occupation
November 3, 2003
For those asleep for the past two years, the _New York Times Magazine_ has a long article by David Rieff, “Blueprint for a Mess”:www.nytimes.com/2003/11/02/magazine/02iraq.html, that looks at ongoing problems with the U.S. occupation of iraq:
bq. Historically, it is rare that a warm welcome is extended to an occupying military force for very long, unless, that is, the postwar goes very smoothly. And in iraq, the postwar occupation has not gone smoothly.
The article looks at the ideological roots of the post-war plan of occupation. A number of key decisions were made in the Pentagon’s war room with little input from the State Department. Much of the planning revolved around Ahmad Chalabi, the two-bit, self-proclaimed iraqi opposition party leader during the last decade of Saddam Hussein’s reign. Chalabi spent most of the 90s in London and Washington, where he became the darling of the Republican policy hawks who were also sidelined from political power. Together Chalabi and Washington figures like Donald Rumsfeld spent the 90s hatching up war plans if they ever took power again. Unfortunately Rumsfeld’s plans didn’t have the widespread support of the U.S. diplomatic and military establishment and Chalabi has had virtually no support inside iraq. But the conversations and decisions between the token iraqi opposition and the out-of-power Republican hawks has driven the occupation:
bq. The lack of security and order on the ground in iraq today is in large measure a result of decisions made and not made in Washington before the war started, and of the specific approaches toward coping with postwar iraq undertaken by American civilian officials and military commanders in the immediate aftermath of the war.
Rieff is pessimistic but he backs up his claims. The article is long but it’s a must-read. The postwar occupations of iraq and Afghanistan will almost certainly be the defining foreign policy issue of this generation, and pacifists must look beyond ideology and rhetoric to understand what’s happening in iraq.
The Bean Defense
July 15, 2003
Readers might remember the field day I had a few weeks ago when US occupying forces announced they had uncovered a cache of beans. They claimed Saddam Hussein had stockpiled a few hundred bags of castor beans to use to make a biological agent called ricin. In my postUS: Iraqis Planned Operation Fart and Stink I pointed out that the supposed weapons worked on the well-documented principle that beans can produce gas and indigestion – ricin just works especially well and concentrates the effect enough to kill someone in a particularly messy way.
What I didn’t do was Google ricin and Iraq. Today I did and found this fascinating article that I missed at the time. U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell claimed an Iraq/ricin connection before the House International Relations Committee back in early February:
“The ricin that is bouncing around Europe now originated in Iraq — not in the part of Iraq that is under Saddam Hussein’s control, but his security forces know all about it,” Powell said.
European intelligence sources quickly discredited this claim, pointing out that it was obvious the European ricin was home-made and not Iraqi. The French were “stunned” that Powell would make such a obviously-wrong statement, and the British flatly stated they were “clear” that that ricin found in London wasn’t produced in Iraq.
Here we have another instance of a senior US official claiming an easily-disprovable claim of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, just weeks after the now-infamous Niger/Iraq forgery appeared in the President’s State of the Union address. Powell and others in the U.S. have trotted out the ricin threat repeatedly yet it’s hard to make a weapon out of the stuff. It’s really only ever been used for a ridiculous James Bond-like assasination in 1991, when a Bulgarian agent is supposed to have killed a dissident in London using a ricin-filled pellet fired from an umbrella tip (one is reminded of Austin Power’s Dr. Evil: “I’m going to place him in an easily escapable situation involving an overly elaborate and exotic death”). As one site points out The current wisdom among biological defense experts is that ricin is more likely to be used as a tool in assassinations than as a weapon of mass destruction.
There is a clear pattern of the Bush Administration deliberately mis-interpreting Iraqi threats to make the case for war. These are purposeful deceptions with only the thinnest escape clause to wiggle through when the lies are exposed. Colin Powell isn’t stupid enough to make this kind of repeated mistake and a year of disproven ricin alerts is a mark against the Administration’s integrity.