<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Henry Cadbury’s 1934 speech and us	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.quakerranter.org/cadbury-and-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/cadbury-and-us/</link>
	<description>A Weekly Newsletter and Blog from Martin Kelley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 19:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rainer Moeller		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/cadbury-and-us/#comment-947899</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rainer Moeller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2018 09:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=61038#comment-947899</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The general opinion seems to be that history has proven Cadbury wrong. But in what way exactly? Eventually, Cadbury&#039;s advice was NOT followed, the &quot;activists&quot; got what they wanted, the boycott happened, a counter-boycott was organized, Jews became much more unwelcome in Germany  and things escalated farther and farther. As Cadbury had foreseen.
The simple center of the Quaker &quot;all men have access to the light&quot; theory is the Golden Rule: in matters of conduct, people (even and above all, enemies) react to each other; so our behaviour is always shifting reciprocally, one time to the better, one time to the worse. This implies that we are co-responsible for the behaviour of our enemies.
The problem of boycotting can be studied at this moment with the BDS movement. There are already Jewish counter-boycotts in the cultural area, and (from a European point of view) I don&#039;t foresee which side will win that war.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The general opinion seems to be that history has proven Cadbury wrong. But in what way exactly? Eventually, Cadbury’s advice was NOT followed, the “activists” got what they wanted, the boycott happened, a counter-boycott was organized, Jews became much more unwelcome in Germany  and things escalated farther and farther. As Cadbury had foreseen.<br>
The simple center of the Quaker “all men have access to the light” theory is the Golden Rule: in matters of conduct, people (even and above all, enemies) react to each other; so our behaviour is always shifting reciprocally, one time to the better, one time to the worse. This implies that we are co-responsible for the behaviour of our enemies.<br>
The problem of boycotting can be studied at this moment with the BDS movement. There are already Jewish counter-boycotts in the cultural area, and (from a European point of view) I don’t foresee which side will win that war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chervil		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/cadbury-and-us/#comment-947831</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chervil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 17:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=61038#comment-947831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[World War One as well - he lost his position at Haverford

http://www.friendsjournal.org/henry-cadbury-afsc-haverford/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>World War One as well — he lost his position at Haverford</p>
<p><a href="http://www.friendsjournal.org/henry-cadbury-afsc-haverford/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.friendsjournal.org/henry-cadbury-afsc-haverford/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Micah Bales		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/cadbury-and-us/#comment-947821</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Micah Bales]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 23:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=61038#comment-947821</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is a very interesting post in our current political moment, with so many cries for &quot;civility&quot; in the face of right-wing abuses. I hope we have learned that passivity and appeasement doesn&#039;t work. 

It&#039;s easy enough to talk about what doesn&#039;t work - but what does? It&#039;s clear we don&#039;t know the answer yet. 

Men and women of conscience are still working out what a full-bodied, uncompromising, Christ-like response is to this new wave authoritarianism. May the Holy Spirit guide us all. And may Quakers not be slow in joining with the work of Christ beyond our little society. We must learn to follow as well as lead.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting post in our current political moment, with so many cries for “civility” in the face of right-wing abuses. I hope we have learned that passivity and appeasement doesn’t work. </p>
<p>It’s easy enough to talk about what doesn’t work — but what does? It’s clear we don’t know the answer yet. </p>
<p>Men and women of conscience are still working out what a full-bodied, uncompromising, Christ-like response is to this new wave authoritarianism. May the Holy Spirit guide us all. And may Quakers not be slow in joining with the work of Christ beyond our little society. We must learn to follow as well as lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rex A. Sprouse		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/cadbury-and-us/#comment-947820</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex A. Sprouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=61038#comment-947820</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My thoughts about Quakerism and &quot;the problem of evil&quot;: I really DO believe that all human beings, regardless of their conscious or implicit beliefs, have direct access to the Inner Light, which IF THEY LISTEN TO IT, could lead them to higher levels of moral behavior and move them toward unity with the underlying harmony of the universe (God). In my view, the naive side of much of Quaker history has been a failure to appreciate how often individuals, collectives, and institutions CHOOSE NOT TO LISTEN; indeed, I think that we fail to appreciate how often WE QUAKERS choose not to listen. In any case, none of this licenses me to resort to violence, but it DOES mean that all kinds of non-violent resistance to evil may well be called for, and that pacifism is NOT incompatible with non-violent resistance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts about Quakerism and “the problem of evil”: I really DO believe that all human beings, regardless of their conscious or implicit beliefs, have direct access to the Inner Light, which IF THEY LISTEN TO IT, could lead them to higher levels of moral behavior and move them toward unity with the underlying harmony of the universe (God). In my view, the naive side of much of Quaker history has been a failure to appreciate how often individuals, collectives, and institutions CHOOSE NOT TO LISTEN; indeed, I think that we fail to appreciate how often WE QUAKERS choose not to listen. In any case, none of this licenses me to resort to violence, but it DOES mean that all kinds of non-violent resistance to evil may well be called for, and that pacifism is NOT incompatible with non-violent resistance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
