<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google: internet interest in Quakers declining	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.quakerranter.org/google_internet_interest_in_qu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/google_internet_interest_in_qu/</link>
	<description>A Weekly Newsletter and Blog from Martin Kelley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:30:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Christine Greenland		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/google_internet_interest_in_qu/#comment-1463</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christine Greenland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=760#comment-1463</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Young adults (18-25) seem to use belief-net.com more than those of us who are &quot;established&quot;. My son (age 25) tried it within the past few months -- equally weighted between liberal Quaker and Buddhist, apparently.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Young adults (18–25) seem to use belief-net.com more than those of us who are “established”. My son (age 25) tried it within the past few months — equally weighted between liberal Quaker and Buddhist, apparently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Amanda		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/google_internet_interest_in_qu/#comment-1462</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amanda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=760#comment-1462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Robin, that&#039;s the first thing that jumped into my head as well! :)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin, that’s the first thing that jumped into my head as well! 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robin Mohr		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/google_internet_interest_in_qu/#comment-1461</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin Mohr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=760#comment-1461</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was wondering if fewer people are taking the beliefnet quiz nowadays.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if fewer people are taking the beliefnet quiz nowadays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eileen Flanagan		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/google_internet_interest_in_qu/#comment-1460</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eileen Flanagan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=760#comment-1460</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My first thought was that many people may have looked for us before and earlier in the war when they were hopeful that the peace movement might stop it. Just speculation, but if correct it&#039;s sad that interest in us would decline as the war has gone on, rather than increase.
Eileen
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought was that many people may have looked for us before and earlier in the war when they were hopeful that the peace movement might stop it. Just speculation, but if correct it’s sad that interest in us would decline as the war has gone on, rather than increase.<br>
Eileen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin Kelley		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/google_internet_interest_in_qu/#comment-1459</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Kelley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=760#comment-1459</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quakerranter.org/google_internet_interest_in_qu/#comment-1458&quot;&gt;Marshall Massey (Iowa YM [C])&lt;/a&gt;.

@marshall: I&#039;ve found that only a very small percentage of visitors to most Quaker sites are actually the kind of business Friend you describe. I don&#039;t think the entire body of Friends is big enough to make a dent in Google searches, even for our own denomination.
@all: I don&#039;t want to make too much of this chart, it was just something curious. It might represent all sorts of things. For example, maybe two-word searches in Google have declined over the past few years. Or maybe it&#039;s shifting demographics on the web and their different interests. I just typed in a bunch of denominations and they all drop the same way. I doubt it really has anything to do with us.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.quakerranter.org/google_internet_interest_in_qu/#comment-1458">Marshall Massey (Iowa YM [C])</a>.</p>
<p>@marshall: I’ve found that only a very small percentage of visitors to most Quaker sites are actually the kind of business Friend you describe. I don’t think the entire body of Friends is big enough to make a dent in Google searches, even for our own denomination.<br>
@all: I don’t want to make too much of this chart, it was just something curious. It might represent all sorts of things. For example, maybe two-word searches in Google have declined over the past few years. Or maybe it’s shifting demographics on the web and their different interests. I just typed in a bunch of denominations and they all drop the same way. I doubt it really has anything to do with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marshall Massey (Iowa YM [C])		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/google_internet_interest_in_qu/#comment-1458</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marshall Massey (Iowa YM [C])]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=760#comment-1458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am guessing that a lot of the early searches were by people who  are Friends themselves or have regular business with Friends.  Most such people must have bookmarked nearly every Quaker site they need by now, so that they need to search far less often.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am guessing that a lot of the early searches were by people who  are Friends themselves or have regular business with Friends.  Most such people must have bookmarked nearly every Quaker site they need by now, so that they need to search far less often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin Kelley		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/google_internet_interest_in_qu/#comment-1457</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Kelley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=760#comment-1457</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quakerranter.org/talking_faith_and_outreach_wit/#comment-1455&quot;&gt;Martin Kelley&lt;/a&gt;.

This was more just a Twitter-like post than a full-on blog post. This comes via a new service from Google that&#039;s making the rounds of the tech blogs this morning. You get to to chart the popularity of search phrases. Typing in &quot;quaker&quot; or &quot;quakers&quot; is too broad (oats, parrots, assorted Pennsylvania companies and high school sports teams) so I did &quot;quakers friends&quot; which I&#039;ve found works well to isolate posts on the religious society.
I&#039;m not sure it means anything. Just interesting to see it decline over time.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.quakerranter.org/talking_faith_and_outreach_wit/#comment-1455">Martin Kelley</a>.</p>
<p>This was more just a Twitter-like post than a full-on blog post. This comes via a new service from Google that’s making the rounds of the tech blogs this morning. You get to to chart the popularity of search phrases. Typing in “quaker” or “quakers” is too broad (oats, parrots, assorted Pennsylvania companies and high school sports teams) so I did “quakers friends” which I’ve found works well to isolate posts on the religious society.<br>
I’m not sure it means anything. Just interesting to see it decline over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robin Mohr		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/google_internet_interest_in_qu/#comment-1456</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin Mohr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=760#comment-1456</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quakerranter.org/talking_faith_and_outreach_wit/#comment-1454&quot;&gt;Robin Mohr&lt;/a&gt;.

What? No commentary or analysis? What do you think is going on? And what exactly is this graph measuring?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.quakerranter.org/talking_faith_and_outreach_wit/#comment-1454">Robin Mohr</a>.</p>
<p>What? No commentary or analysis? What do you think is going on? And what exactly is this graph measuring?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
