<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: More classic Quaker books available online	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.quakerranter.org/more_classic_quaker_books_avai/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/more_classic_quaker_books_avai/</link>
	<description>A Weekly Newsletter and Blog from Martin Kelley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:16:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin Kelley		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/more_classic_quaker_books_avai/#comment-1081</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Kelley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=231#comment-1081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[*Hi Chris:* You mean how it shows over 42,000 titles with matches to &quot;society of friends&quot;? Yes, that is odd. It looks like the right number is closer to 287, which sounds about right.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Hi Chris:* You mean how it shows over 42,000 titles with matches to “society of friends”? Yes, that is odd. It looks like the right number is closer to 287, which sounds about right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris M.		</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/more_classic_quaker_books_avai/#comment-1080</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=231#comment-1080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Martin,
From the link you&#039;ve provided, the Google search looks as though each and every page they&#039;ve reproduced is indexed as a &quot;hit&quot; on the search.
Just my amateurish opinion.  Thanks for the info, though!
-- Chris M.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin,<br>
From the link you’ve provided, the Google search looks as though each and every page they’ve reproduced is indexed as a “hit” on the search.<br>
Just my amateurish opinion.  Thanks for the info, though!<br>
— Chris M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
