<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>British Friends</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.quakerranter.org/tag/british-friends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/tag/british-friends/</link>
	<description>A Weekly Newsletter and Blog from Martin Kelley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 13:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16720591</site>	<item>
		<title>Belonging and difference</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/belonging-and-difference/</link>
					<comments>https://www.quakerranter.org/belonging-and-difference/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Kelley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 16:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Quaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acknowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[difficulty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[place]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.quakerranter.org/?p=61700</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gil S on continuity and change: Many of us find difficulty in facing change. The way a meeting house is arranged and the way Quaker faith is expressed have both changed over time. There have always been those who find it difficult if not impossible to let go of what has gone before. In my [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gil S on continuity and change:</p>
<blockquote><p>
  Many of us find difficulty in facing change. The way a meeting house is arranged and the way Quaker faith is expressed have both changed over time. There have always been those who find it difficult if not impossible to let go of what has gone before. In my local meeting I always sit in the same place and acknowledge that I find change difficult, but in spite of this there are ways in which I have changed.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I suspect part of thr context of this is the hopes and fears of British Friends as they embark on a recision of their book of Faith and Practice. An editing group has recently been named.</p>
<p>https://stumblingstepping.blogspot.com/2019/02/belonging-and-difference.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.quakerranter.org/belonging-and-difference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">61700</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Friends survey on diversity</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/british-friends-survey-on-diversity/</link>
					<comments>https://www.quakerranter.org/british-friends-survey-on-diversity/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Kelley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Quaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[need]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[someone]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.quakerranter.org/?p=61613</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[From Britain Yearly Meeting: What ways are we already diverse? Where do our strengths and weaknesses lie in terms of inclusion? Both these questions need to be answered if we are to understand the nature and make up of this old and important faith community that has a history of significant contributions to British and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Britain Yearly Meeting:</p>
<blockquote><p>
  What ways are we already diverse? Where do our strengths and weaknesses lie in terms of inclusion? Both these questions need to be answered if we are to understand the nature and make up of this old and important faith community that has a history of significant contributions to British and international equality.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This intro document leaves me little unsure what kinds of diversity they’re looking for. Demographic? Spiritual? Geographic? The one quote suggests that someone hopes the results might help advance their agenda. Is this just a one-off SurveyMonkey or will there be more to it?</p>
<div class=" content_cards_card content_cards_domain_www-quaker-org-uk">
<div class="content_cards_image">
				<a class="content_cards_image_link" href="http://www.quaker.org.uk/blog/diversity-where-are-we-now"><br>
					<img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.quaker.org.uk/media/W1siZiIsIjIwMTgvMTIvMTMvMTQvMDUvNTYvZjU2ZjEyOTctMGNhYy00ZjllLThhN2YtODI3NTA0ZTM3YjUwL2RpdmVyaXN0eS1nYXRoZXJpbmctcGljLWNyb3AuanBnIl0sWyJwIiwidGh1bWIiLCIxMjAweDYzMCMiXV0/diveristy-gathering-pic-crop.jpg?w=640&#038;ssl=1" alt="Diversity: where are we now?">				</a>
		</div>
<div class="content_cards_title">
		<a class="content_cards_title_link" href="http://www.quaker.org.uk/blog/diversity-where-are-we-now"><br>
			Diversity: where are we now?		</a>
	</div>
<div class="content_cards_description">
		<a class="content_cards_description_link" href="http://www.quaker.org.uk/blog/diversity-where-are-we-now">
<p>​Quakers in Britain are taking part in a survey to map the diversity of their faith and influence…</p>
<p>		</p></a>
	</div>
<div class="content_cards_site_name">
		<img decoding="async" src="http://www.quaker.org.uk/assets/favicon-800eaedd0346f6ef0d469efdd10ea1bd9fccac34df30b46ae8f6d7f5675b1a61.ico" alt="Quakers" class="content_cards_favicon">		Quakers	</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.quakerranter.org/british-friends-survey-on-diversity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">61613</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sam Walton: Putting the protest back in Protestant</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/sam-walton-putting-the-protest-back-in-protestant/</link>
					<comments>https://www.quakerranter.org/sam-walton-putting-the-protest-back-in-protestant/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Kelley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Quaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[going]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Walton Putting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.quakerranter.org/?p=61242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[From the Peace and Disarmament Programme Manger for British Friends comes a plea for us not to be afraid of going back to Quaker roots and challenge the abuse of power. Society’s values are so often in opposition to God’s purposes. Slavery used to be legal. Love between two people of the same sex was [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Peace and Disarmament Programme Manger for British Friends comes a plea for us not to be afraid of going back to Quaker roots and challenge the abuse of power.</p>
<blockquote><p>Society’s values are so often in opposition to God’s purposes. Slavery used to be legal. Love between two people of the same sex was illegal in our lifetimes. Our economic system is based on greed and pays no heed to God’s creation. Nation states exist and act for their own enrichment rather than loyalties lying with the Kingdom of Heaven and working for the enrichment of all humanity. When being loyal to God’s purposes runs counter to what society expects it can get pretty rough. There may be persecution, though it varies a lot: from tutting, telling you off for being vegetarian, being given white feathers, right through to imprisonment, jails and the lions of the Colosseum.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="hAuQCijzIQ"><p><a href="https://www.greenbelt.org.uk/putting-the-protest-back-in-protestant/">Putting the protest back in Protestant</a></p></blockquote>
<p><iframe class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted"  title="“Putting the protest back in Protestant” — Greenbelt" src="https://www.greenbelt.org.uk/putting-the-protest-back-in-protestant/embed/#?secret=VuCTtubPqY#?secret=hAuQCijzIQ" data-secret="hAuQCijzIQ" width="600" height="338" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.quakerranter.org/sam-walton-putting-the-protest-back-in-protestant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">61242</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Quakers are right. We don’t need God</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/the-quakers-are-right-we-dont-need-god/</link>
					<comments>https://www.quakerranter.org/the-quakers-are-right-we-dont-need-god/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Kelley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 13:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Quaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[everyone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[view]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=60798</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well-know British journalist (tho non-Friend) weighs in on recent headlines claiming British Friends are taking God out of their next edition of Faith and Practice: The Quakers are right. We don’t need God The Quakers’ lack of ceremony and liturgical clutter gives them a point from which to view the no man’s land between faith [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well-know British journalist (tho non-Friend) weighs in on recent headlines claiming British Friends are taking God out of their next edition of <em>Faith and Practice</em>: <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/04/quakers-dropping-god?CMP=share_btn_fb">The Quakers are right. We don’t need God</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The Quakers’ lack of ceremony and liturgical clutter gives them a point from which to view the no man’s land between faith and non-faith that is the “new religiosity”. A dwindling 40% of Britons claim to believe in some form of God, while a third say they are atheists</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The piece is sure to get everyone’s dander up. It feels to me as if Jenkins is chasing the headline to advance his own argument without regard to how his statement might polarize Friends. But this is one of the rarer instances in which it’s worth digging through the comments on this one; some are better than the article itself.</p>
<p>https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/04/quakers-dropping-god?CMP=share_btn_fb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.quakerranter.org/the-quakers-are-right-we-dont-need-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">60798</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Profile of tech use by British Friends</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/profile-of-tech-use-by-british-friends/</link>
					<comments>https://www.quakerranter.org/profile-of-tech-use-by-british-friends/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Kelley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 20:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Quaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=60408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Irit Pollak and Abbey Kos at doteveryone have been doing a series “Dispatches from the Real World,” in which they profile “unexpected changes new technology is having on services and people.” This month they look at Friends in Britain. It’s written for a tech audience and leans a bit on the dichotomy between old (“It [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irit Pollak and Abbey Kos at doteveryone have been doing a series “Dispatches from the Real World,” in which they profile “<a href="https://medium.com/doteveryone/this-is-dispatches-from-the-real-world-5e28db4ad983">unexpected changes new technology is having on services and people</a>.” This month they look at <a href="https://medium.com/doteveryone/dispatches-from-the-real-world-03-quakers-in-britain-d2b8632db926">Friends in Britain</a>.</p>
<p>It’s written for a tech audience and leans a bit on the dichotomy between old (“It still looks much the same as it did in 1670”) and modern communication but there are some insights that we Friends sometimes take too much for granted:</p>
<blockquote><p>Social media tends towards the shallow and boastful. That’s not an intuitive fit for the meticulous work of ecumenical accompaniment, nor for a faith that values authenticity and depth. However, Teresa and her team know they need to do more — not despite their beliefs, but because of them.</p></blockquote>
<p>I also appreciate the comparison between Quaker organization and principles of decentralization found in networks.</p>
<blockquote><p>Just as in tech, decentralisation — building a more networked approach — is high on Quakers’ agenda. But that journey is perhaps easier for a faith fundamentally opposed to hierarchy. Now, rather than try to hang onto old models, Quakers in Britain are actively (and continuously) checking their power and privilege.</p></blockquote>
<p>Friends Journal ran a whole issue on <a href="https://www.friendsjournal.org/2016/quakers-and-social-media/">Quakers and Social Media</a> back in November 2016. One of my favorite FJ tech pieces however was in November 2015, when we interviewed Sue Gardiner to understand why <a href="https://www.friendsjournal.org/consensus-in-tech/">Wikimedia was so interesting in Quaker process</a>.</p>
<div class=" content_cards_card content_cards_domain_medium-com">
			<div class="content_cards_image">
				<a class="content_cards_image_link" href="https://medium.com/doteveryone/dispatches-from-the-real-world-03-quakers-in-britain-d2b8632db926">
					<img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/miro.medium.com/v2/resize%3Afit%3A1200/1%2Ae_pbli12FG7prhWl6pAbPw.jpeg?w=640&#038;ssl=1" alt="Dispatches from the Real World 03: Quakers in Britain">				</a>
		</div>
	
	<div class="content_cards_title">
		<a class="content_cards_title_link" href="https://medium.com/doteveryone/dispatches-from-the-real-world-03-quakers-in-britain-d2b8632db926">
			Dispatches from the Real World 03: Quakers in Britain		</a>
	</div>
	<div class="content_cards_description">
		<a class="content_cards_description_link" href="https://medium.com/doteveryone/dispatches-from-the-real-world-03-quakers-in-britain-d2b8632db926">
			<p>Can tech help a quiet faith find a bigger voice? And in a world of constant connection, could…</p>
		</a>
	</div>
	<div class="content_cards_site_name">
		<img decoding="async" src="https://miro.medium.com/v2/5d8de952517e8160e40ef9841c781cdc14a5db313057fa3c3de41c6f5b494b19" alt="Medium" class="content_cards_favicon">		Medium	</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.quakerranter.org/profile-of-tech-use-by-british-friends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">60408</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
