<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Supreme Court - Quaker Ranter</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.quakerranter.org/tag/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.quakerranter.org</link>
	<description>A Weekly Newsletter and Blog from Martin Kelley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:15:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16720591</site>	<item>
		<title>In the New Yorker, an article on atheism leads with a Daniel Seeger’s 1965 Supreme Court case</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/in-the-new-yorker-an-article-on-atheism-leads-with-a-daniel-seegers-1965-supreme-court-case/</link>
					<comments>https://www.quakerranter.org/in-the-new-yorker-an-article-on-atheism-leads-with-a-daniel-seegers-1965-supreme-court-case/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Kelley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Quaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carol Holmes Alpern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Seeger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Seeger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new yorker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.quakerranter.org/?p=61524</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A review of two books on atheism starts with the take of Dan Seeger, who’s landmark Supreme Court case extended the right to conscientious objector status to agnostics and atheists: Daniel Seeger was twenty-one when he wrote to his local draft board to say, “I have concluded that war, from the practical standpoint, is futile [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A review of two books on atheism starts with the take of Dan Seeger, who’s landmark Supreme Court case extended the right to conscientious objector status to agnostics and atheists:</p>
<blockquote><p>
  Daniel Seeger was twenty-one when he wrote to his local draft board to say, “I have concluded that war, from the practical standpoint, is futile and self-defeating, and from the more important moral standpoint, it is unethical.” Some time later, he received the United States Selective Service System’s Form 150, asking him to detail his objections to military service. It took him a few days to reply, because he had no answer for the form’s first question: “Do you believe in a Supreme Being?” Unsatisfied with the two available options—“Yes” and “No”—Seeger finally decided to draw and check a third box: “See attached pages.”</p>
<p>  Seeger’s victory helped mark a turning point for a minority that had once been denied so much as the right to testify in court, even in their own defense. Atheists, long discriminated against by civil authorities and derided by their fellow-citizens, were suddenly eligible for some of the exemptions and protections that had previously been restricted to believers.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Daniel Seeger has written for and been featured in the pages of <em>Friends Journal</em> many times over the ensuing decades but last year he wrote a great feature for us about the court case, <a href="https://www.friendsjournal.org/conscientious-objection-seeger/">An AFSC Defense of the Rights of Conscience</a>. A tip of the hat to Carol Holmes Alpern for sending this <em>New Yorker</em> article way!</p>
<p>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/29/why-are-americans-still-uncomfortable-with-atheism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.quakerranter.org/in-the-new-yorker-an-article-on-atheism-leads-with-a-daniel-seegers-1965-supreme-court-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">61524</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four More Years (Let’s Roll Up Our Sleeves)</title>
		<link>https://www.quakerranter.org/four_more_years_lets_roll_up_o/</link>
					<comments>https://www.quakerranter.org/four_more_years_lets_roll_up_o/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Kelley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2004 08:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture of peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george w bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saddam hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vice president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quakerranter.org/?p=546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[President George W. Bush has been re-elected for four more years. The man who led the United States to “two wars in four years”:http://www.nonviolence.org/articles/cat_iraq_antiwar.php and whose policies in Afghanistan and iraq continue to create chaos in both countries will get four more years to pursue his war of terrorism against the world. Americans will not [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President George W. Bush has been re-elected for four more years. The man who led the United States to “two wars in four years”:http://www.nonviolence.org/articles/cat_iraq_antiwar.php and whose policies in Afghanistan and iraq continue to create chaos in both countries will get four more years to pursue his war of terrorism against the world. Americans will not sleep any safer but will dream ever more of conquering and killing enemies. We’ll continue to sow the seeds of wars for generations to come.<br>
I was worried when Senator John Kerry unexpectedly picked up in the primaries to become the Democratic presidential candidate. In his patrician upbringing he was very much like President Bush, and they actually agreed on many of the big issues — war, gay marriage, stem cell research. But in his personality, style and temperament Kerry was too much like former Vice President Al Gore.<br>
Yes, I know Gore won the popular vote in the 2000 election and that his loss was declared by mysterious chads and a handful of senior citizen judges in Washington, D.C. But an election as close as that one should have been seen as a resounding loss, no matter what the Supreme Court verdict. As Vice President, Gore had helped lead the nation to one of its greatest economic recovers in our lifetimes. He was also clearly smarter in the President, more knowledgeable and farsighted, with more carefully articulated visions of the future. But he barely won the popular vote, making the electoral college vote close enough to be debated.<br>
Kerry is intellectual and aloof in the same way that Gore was. And clearly there are a number of American voters who don’t want that. They want a candidate who can speak from the heart, who isn’t afraid to talk about faith. They also want a candidate who can talk in simple, morally unambiguous ways about war.<br>
And what about war? Would a President Kerry have really pulled out troops sooner than President Bush will? Who knows: Democratic Presidents have pursued plenty of wars over the last century and when Kerry proclaimed he would hunt down and kill the enemy, he spoke as the only one of the four men on the major tickets who actually has hunted down and killed fellow humans in wartime.<br>
We can make an educated guess that a Kerry-led America would leave iraq in better shape than a Bush-led America will. Kerry has the patience and the planning foresight to do the hard coalition-building work in iraq and in the world that is necessary if U.S. military power will translate to a real peace. But a Kerry plan for pacification and rebuilding of iraq could easily have followed the path that Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson’s did in Vietnam: an unending, constantly-escalating war.<br>
Did Americans officially approve the country’s past two wars yesterday? It’s hard to conclude otherwise. Despite the lies of mass destruction and despite the “willful misleading of the American people”:http://www.nonviolence.org/articles/000194.php that Saddam Hussein was somehow involved in the 9/11 attacks and “possessed weapons of mass destruction”:http://www.nonviolence.org/articles/cat_iraq_weapons_of_mass_destruction_scandal.php, something over 50% of Americans thought the Bush/Cheney Presidency was worth keeping for another four years.<br>
But there’s nothing to say a popular vote grants wisdom. In the next four years, those of us wanting an alternative will probably have many “teachable moments” to talk with our neighbors and friends about the deteriorating situation in iraq and Afghanistan. Maybe those of us whose “pacifism is informed by religious understandings”:www.nonviolence.org/martink/archives/000462.php can cross the intellectual divide some more and talk about how our faith gives us a simple, morally unambiguous way to argue against war. The country needs “strong pacifist voices”:http://www.nonviolence.org/issues/philosophy-nonviolence.php now more than ever. Let’s get talking.<br>
ps: …and donating. Nonviolence.org is a nine years old peace resource guide and blog. It’s time it gets regular funding from its million annual readers. “Please give generously and help us expand this work”:http://www.nonviolence.org/support/. We have a lot to do in the next four years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.quakerranter.org/four_more_years_lets_roll_up_o/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">546</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
