Nilay Patel on why blogs are still great

March 11, 2025

The Verge’s Decoder turns the table on its host, Nilay Patel, to talk about blogs. I often appre­ci­ate Patel’s take on the mod­ern web. And while I run a few web­sites, I appre­ci­ate his joke that The Verge is “the last web­site on earth.” There was a cer­tain kind of web­site back in the day that you’d vis­it direct­ly to see what they were say­ing. Their reporters were fun­ny and snarky and opin­ion­at­ed and even when I dis­agreed with their take, I was usu­al­ly glad I had tak­en the time to read it. There’s a few indi­vid­ual blog­gers like that left, folks like Jason Kot­tke and John Gru­ber, but few sites still like The Verge, in my opin­ion. So much of the con­ver­sa­tion today hap­pens on social media, where it’s frac­tured (Mastodon? Face­book? Threads? Bluesky?) and ephemeral.

About a year ago, The Verge went for a more old-school blog­ging mod­el, based on appeal­ing to peo­ple vis­it­ing the site direct­ly rather than Google algo­rithms. I’m glad they did that. 

There’s also good stuff in her about brands: “But you know what? All the celebri­ties still want to be on the cov­er of mag­a­zines. They want the val­i­da­tion that the big brand, the insti­tu­tion, can pro­vide. And there’s a rea­son for that because the brand stands for more than just an indi­vid­ual opin­ion — or at least at its best it does.” I think that’s true for my work with Friends Jour­nal. Any­one can write some­thing and post it any­where, yet there still seems to be a yearn­ing for a place that’s still a common-ground water­ing hole, a conversation-starter.

Reading: George Fox – the First Quaker Socialist?

March 11, 2025

Gra­ham Tay­lor with a well-cited arti­cle on the proto-socialism of ear­ly Friends. There’s a bit of anachro­nis­tic think­ing going on here, which he admits to. But it’s also the case that a lot of Quak­er his­to­ry is viewed through the lens of lat­er Quak­ers and often ignores what was hap­pen­ing out­side of Quak­erism at the time. This can lead to bad his­to­ries. I’m not sure I buy some of Tay­lor’s argu­ments but it’s a good exer­cise and Fox cer­tain­ly did talk about eco­nom­ics as part of his call for justice.

Where Do We Find Our Hope?

March 11, 2025

Decem­ber’s Friends Jour­nal is online and looks at Spir­i­tu­al Opti­mism vs. Spir­i­tu­al Pessimism. 

> Has there ever been an age in human his­to­ry in which we could be pure­ly opti­mistic or pure­ly pes­simistic? Quak­er founder George Fox wrote that his min­istry arose “when all my hopes in [preach­ers and expe­ri­enced peo­ple] were gone, so that I had noth­ing out­ward­ly to help me, nor could tell what to do.” He famous­ly found inspi­ra­tion, guid­ance, and courage in “one, even Christ Jesus,” who could speak to his con­di­tion. What keeps us going today in a world always ready to implode or blossom?

REVIEWED: A Friend in Deed: The Life of Henry Stanley Newman

March 11, 2025

I very occa­sion­al­ly do a book review for the mag­a­zine. My col­league Gail thought I might be inter­est­ed in this biog­ra­phy of the longest-serving edi­tor of our British coun­ter­part, “The Friend.” 

The part of Hen­ry Stan­ley New­man’s life that I found most fas­ci­nat­ing was his generation’s abil­i­ty to bend tech­ni­cal­i­ties almost to the break­ing point in order to main­tain for­mal uni­ty. As a young man, he rebelled against the stodgy and insu­lar Quak­erism of his upbring­ing and found a way to cre­ate a par­al­lel spir­i­tu­al life based on evan­gel­i­cal prin­ci­ples. In mid­dle life, estab­lished and respect­ed, he faced chal­lenges from the younger lib­er­als and man­aged to stay engaged and keep them with­in the fold. In the Unit­ed States, these same ten­den­cies toward first evan­gel­i­cal and then lib­er­al the­olo­gies both result­ed in schisms, many of which still divide Friends here. 

Almost twen­ty years ago I vis­it­ed a small Mid­west­ern U.S. year­ly meet­ing that real­ly felt like a fam­i­ly, both in its bonds and its dys­func­tions. I liked it. One of the most respect­ed mem­bers was gay and at some point ear­li­er he was nom­i­nat­ed to be the year­ly meet­ing clerk. This was a non-starter for a mem­ber church that also affil­i­at­ed with an Evan­gel­i­cal year­ly meet­ing. After some back and forth he was was approved as an assis­tant clerk, a solu­tion every­one could live with. Log­i­cal­ly it makes absolute­ly no sense — if gay­ness pre­cludes one from one year­ly meet­ing posi­tion it should for any. But the year­ly meet­ing want­ed him and knew he’d be good in lead­er­ship and found a way to make it work and he cheer­ful­ly accept­ed the sit­u­a­tion. (The sit­u­a­tion didn’t last and the dual-affiliated meet­ing even­tu­al­ly had to make a choice and dis­af­fil­i­ate from one of its year­ly meetings.) 

There’s an impulse toward puri­ty that woudn’t have allowed these kinds of nego­ti­at­ed com­pro­mis­es. A young New­man, start­ing Evan­gel­i­cal orga­ni­za­tions left and right that were nom­i­nal­ly out­side of Quak­er struc­ture but full of Quak­ers, would have been dis­owned. The Mid­west year­ly meet­ing would have splin­tered over an insis­tence of a clerk sta­tus. I cer­tain­ly under­stand puri­ty: some­times we need to make a stand. But some­times it’s more impor­tant to be a log­i­cal­ly incon­sis­tent fam­i­ly than to be alone in our cor­rect­ness. Hen­ry Stan­ley Newman’s com­pro­mis­es is an inter­est­ing mod­el for us, still.