Membership — in a Yearly Meeting?

Steven Davi­son looks at a pro­pos­al to record mem­bers at the year­ly meet­ing level:

with­out mean­ing­ful pas­toral care, reg­u­lar wor­ship, spir­i­tu­al nur­ture, and a fel­low­ship that goes deep­er than just three annu­al meet­ings could pro­vide, what does “mem­ber­ship” mean? All that’s left is Quak­er iden­ti­ty and a sense of belong­ing to the unique spir­i­tu­al com­mu­ni­ty that is New York Year­ly Meet­ing. To me, that’s a half-baked Quak­er life.

Mem­ber­ship — in a Year­ly Meeting?

One thought on “Membership — in a Yearly Meeting?

  1. Sierra-Cascades YM records mem­bers at the YM lev­el. One or two dozen or so peo­ple became mem­bers at their Annu­al Ses­sions in May. These were gen­er­al­ly peo­ple who had been mem­bers else­where, but with the split from NWYM, their mem­ber­ships were lost. 

    It’s some­thing I know I’ve heard YAFs in BYM talk about want­i­ng. And I want­ed it too, espe­cial­ly when I was in col­lege. It did­n’t make sense to me to become a mem­ber of Friends Meet­ing of Wash­ing­ton, when I was going to grad­u­ate in a year and pos­si­bly move to who-knows-what city. I could more read­i­ly com­mit to Quak­ers in the mid-Atlantic region than to Quak­ers in a par­tic­u­lar neigh­bor­hood of a city that takes an hour to cross.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments on Quaker Ranter Daily