Obviously the biggest Quaker news this week is a number of Quaker bodies (including my own Philadelphia Yearly Meeting) suing the Department of Homeland Security over policy changes that allow immigration agents to go into house of worship. The suit is being widely reported in mainstream media (NBC News, Axios, The New Republic, Reuters, Breitbart, NYPost, Channel 6 Philadelphia, Philadelphia Inquirer).
Quaker Ranter
A Weekly Newsletter and Blog from Martin Kelley
Yearly Archives ⇒ 2025
How do we use money?
January 2, 2025
The newest Friends Journal issue is out, looking at how we use money. It’s perhaps not the sexiest topic but it speaks to what we value as a body of believers. Are we focused on our internal group or on the world outside our walls? Sometimes the discussions around money are tedious and our decisions self-evident. I think it’s possible for a meeting to spend too much time focused on its own self-management. But there are times when discussions of resource use brings out surprising inspiration.
First up in our features is Joann Neuroth’s “Putting Our Money Where Our Hearts Are,” a look at how her meeting in Lansing, Michigan, took seemingly tiny steps that have grown into signifiant community outreach and investment.
When we catch our breath to add it all up, we realize that the volunteers who “feed the pantry” daily have put $11,000 of food in that box each year. It feels a bit like loaves and fishes! Where did it come from, one grocery bag at a time? We are pretty sure anyone proposing an $11,000 program back in 2020 would have been quickly set straight about limits to our capacity. But one can of soup at a time, we have truly surprised ourselves.
Clare Flourish examines a questionable campaign
January 2, 2025
Fascinating and disturbing account of an outspoken Quaker* UK anti-trans activist named Emma Roberts who has started a video podcast interviewing prominent Friends. Most of the episodes have nothing to do with gender and sexuality but some do.
The asterisk up is there because the podcaster apparently renounced their membership in the Society of Friends when Britain Yearly Meeting passed a minute on trans inclusion. I appreciate someone disagreeing with a yearly meeting resolution and even staying in the fold despite the opposition. But when an affirming minute that doesn’t actually affect you (just your ideology) is such a burden that you leave… well then the question is why you would put such effort into a podcast of your ex-religion. it doesn’t seem like a project borne in good faith.
Clair does a great job bringing the receipts and explaining the context (I haven’t been following the details of the UK back-and-forth on this).
www.friendsjournal.org