YouTube: I’m an Atheist. I Visited a Quaker Church.

August 2, 2025

Jared is an athe­ist YouTu­ber whose schtick is vis­it­ing dif­fer­ent church­es. I’ve watched him before so was thrilled to see he’s now vis­it­ed Friends.

He’s very good at observ­ing and under­stand­ing and explain­ing what he’s seen. There’s no sub­stan­tive inac­cu­ra­cies here. He had a deeply mov­ing expe­ri­ence that he says he won’t forget.

That said, he felt dis­ap­point­ed that the meet­ing he vis­it­ed wasn’t more dis­tinct­ly Quak­er, call­ing it a “bait and switch almost.” The only min­istry was polit­i­cal and while he does a good job defend­ing the speaker’s com­pas­sion he says that it felt “solemn but not sacred” to him, which I think is a fas­ci­nat­ing way of putting it:

I’m real­ly inter­est­ed in the hand­ful of peo­ple who feel like they’ve touched God. I don’t, but It’s still a pro­found thing to talk to some­body who’s don’t that.

He grew up Pen­te­costal and knew that there was a lot of crossover with ear­ly Friends. That’s what he was look­ing for. I think his obser­va­tions on this was prob­a­bly pret­ty fair for most Lib­er­al Friends meet­ings today. I think there are oth­er seek­ers like him want­i­ng to expe­ri­ence some­thing more dis­tinc­tive­ly and reli­gious­ly Quak­er. Over­all, an awe­some video, very recommended.

FBI Agents Seize Quaker Activist from His Home in Morning Raid

July 31, 2025

Scary sto­ry about Jacob Hoopes, the son of well-known Philly-area Quak­ers being arrest­ed at his home in Port­land, Ore­gon, on sus­pi­cions of par­tic­i­pat­ing in vio­lent anti-ICE protests a few weeks ago.

The pros­e­cu­tors have released a bunch of pic­tures of vio­lent activ­i­ty being per­pe­trat­ed by some­one who looks like Jacob, with a sim­i­lar arm tat­too. That pro­tes­tor threw a brick at an ICE agent that hit his head, drew blood, and required med­ical attention.

I sure hope it’s not Jacob in those pho­tos and that his defense attor­neys can prove it.

www.friendsjournal.org www​.friend​sjour​nal​.org

Lat­er update: Sad to say the pho­tos were Jacob and he real­ly did engage in mul­ti­ple actions of prop­er­ty destruc­tion and bod­i­ly harm that day. The famil leaned on the Quak­er defense claim­ing he was inno­cent as pure dri­ven snow until the defense lawyers con­vinced them the evi­dence was over­whelm­ing (of course it was, the place was lined with cam­eras and press) and told them to take a plea deal. He’ll be spend­ing 30 months in jail with no chance of ear­ly release. How tragic.

Ready to die for the silence

July 15, 2025

I’m pret­ty used to the stan­dard rhetor­i­cal paths of Quak­er sto­ries after so many years as an edi­tor but every once in a while one comes along and knocks my socks off.

I’ve writ­ten before1 that I’m not a fan of the “when to speak in meet­ing” flow­charts Friends some­times post in the meet­ing­house to dis­cour­age vocal min­istry. One is expect­ed to test an incom­ing mes­sage against half a dozen queries and only speak if they can clear them all in the space of an hour. A lot of new­com­ers see these and decide to just keep quiet.

Chris­tine Hart­mann was just one of these new atten­ders. She writes “after study­ing all this, I decid­ed to hold off speak­ing in meet­ing, if at all pos­si­ble, for fear of get­ting it wrong.” She was so care­ful and so scrupu­lous that her silence almost cost her her life. I’m not kid­ding. Lit­er­al­ly. Read the arti­cle. Wild, wild.

(Yes, there are dis­rup­tive new­com­ers who give inap­pro­pri­ate min­istry in Quak­er wor­ship. In my expe­ri­ence they’re rarely the ones sit­ting down and study­ing flow­charts. The vis­i­tors these charts deter are the care­ful and thought­ful ones who are already tying them­selves in knots won­der­ing whether they should speak. These are the folks you want to encourage.) 

www.friendsjournal.org www​.friend​sjour​nal​.org

What Have Friends Been Reading?

July 12, 2025

There’s a new top-five list of arti­cles from Friends Jour­nal so far in 2025. We have a cou­ple of news ones — the law­suits against DHS and the recent Quak­er Walk — but we also have more con­tem­pla­tive fair.

I like the sto­ry of the Friends at William Penn Uni­ver­si­ty in Iowa dis­cov­er­ing some of the pos­i­tive qual­i­ties of plain dress from a inter­net chal­lenge. And Gail Melix (Greenwater)‘s reflec­tion on being both Quak­er and Indige­nous is quite moving.

www.friendsjournal.org www​.friend​sjour​nal​.org

Influencing Quakers

July 2, 2025

Philadel­phia Year­ly Meet­ing and Friends in Busi­ness spon­sored a two-person pan­el last night called “Quak­er Voic­es, Dig­i­tal Paths” and fea­tur­ing Glo­ria Sul­li­van, who has over 600,000 fol­low­ers across Tik­Tok and Insta­gram, and Grif­fin Macaulay, con­tent cre­ator for Dun­geons and Drag­ons. Glo­ria does­n’t gen­er­al­ly talk about being a Quak­er on her chan­nel but did in Jan­u­ary. It’s had over 300,000 views and a stag­ger­ing 6,042 comments. 

The scale of the new­er forms of online media is real­ly stag­ger­ing, as is the sim­plic­i­ty of start­ing a chan­nel. There’s no need to incor­po­rate or find fun­ders or write mis­sion state­ments: you just start talk­ing to the com­put­er. It quick­ly becomes all-consuming of course, and there’s a lot of thought that goes into the top­ics and scope of the chan­nel. All the pop­u­lar Tik­Toks also have lots of edits to speed them up. It’s a lot of work to do this part or full-time.

Grif­fin talked about being known for a thing and remain­ing pas­sion­ate about it even in a vac­u­um. It’s the follow-your-passion advice: lov­ing what you do will pull peo­ple to you and you will find a way to turn it into a business.

In some ways, I feel that at least some of the work my col­leagues and I are doing 2is akin to an out­field­er scan­ning the sky for pop balls com­ing in from these inter­net men­tions. When a pop­u­lar influ­encer talks about Quak­ers I’m sure hun­dreds of fin­gers open a new tab to ask “What is a Quak­er?” and “What Do Quak­ers Believe?” We hope­ful­ly show up in the search with easily-digestible answers and links to Quak­er com­mu­ni­ties. I asked Glo­ria and Grif­fin for ideas about how we could bet­ter sup­port inquir­ers they might send our way. We’re doing a lot already — good search engine opti­miza­tion, catchy URLs — but there was some good advice on using Insta­gram bet­ter and real­ly sim­pli­fy­ing our mes­sag­ing and turn­ing it into stories. 

Peter Blood-Patterison on Under-the-Radar Revival

June 24, 2025

“In my trav­els and expe­ri­ence with Quak­ers today, I encounter Friends who are going deep­er, learn­ing more about the rad­i­cal faith roots of our faith com­mu­ni­ty, and are will­ing and able to hear oth­ers’ voic­es and expe­ri­ences with “lis­ten­ing in tongues” (learn­ing to trans­late oth­ers’ words about the Holy into lan­guage that speaks to their own con­di­tion). I believe this under-the-radar Quak­er revival will con­tin­ue to deep­en and grow in many ways and many places. How­ev­er, to my mind a great and last­ing Quak­er revival will require us to do the following:”

www.friendsjournal.org www​.friend​sjour​nal​.org

Being Ready for the Seekers

June 5, 2025

I wrote the intro­duc­to­ry col­umn for the June/July issue of Friends Jour­nal, which is devot­ed to revivals.

It’s my pet the­o­ry that Quak­erism is always dying and simul­ta­ne­ous­ly always being reborn. It’s been a messy process with lots of hurt feel­ings. Many peo­ple have left Friends, and there are a bewil­der­ing num­ber of insti­tu­tion­al schisms still divid­ing us. But to para­phrase Mark Twain, the rumors of our death have been great­ly exaggerated.

www.friendsjournal.org www​.friend​sjour​nal​.org

Clare Flourish examines a questionable campaign

January 2, 2025

Fas­ci­nat­ing and dis­turb­ing account of an out­spo­ken Quak­er* UK anti-trans activist named Emma Roberts who has start­ed a video pod­cast inter­view­ing promi­nent Friends. Most of the episodes have noth­ing to do with gen­der and sex­u­al­i­ty but some do.

The aster­isk up is there because the pod­cast­er appar­ent­ly renounced their mem­ber­ship in the Soci­ety of Friends when Britain Year­ly Meet­ing passed a minute on trans inclu­sion. I appre­ci­ate some­one dis­agree­ing with a year­ly meet­ing res­o­lu­tion and even stay­ing in the fold despite the oppo­si­tion. But when an affirm­ing minute that doesn’t actu­al­ly affect you (just your ide­ol­o­gy) is such a bur­den that you leave… well then the ques­tion is why you would put such effort into a pod­cast of your ex-religion. it doesn’t seem like a project borne in good faith.

Clair does a great job bring­ing the receipts and explain­ing the con­text (I haven’t been fol­low­ing the details of the UK back-and-forth on this).