Tread and Trample

July 26, 2025

Over on Red­dit, a dis­cus­sion try­ing to square our oft-quoted advice to see “that of God” with the arrival of secret police on U.S. streets.

I don’t think Quak­ers’ his­tor­i­cal mem­o­ry always serves us very well. In 1656, George Fox wrote a let­ter from Launce­s­ton Gaol, a por­tion of which is quot­ed in every edi­tion of Faith and Prac­tice. It’s been repro­duced as giant posters and the key phrase has become one of the go-to ele­va­tor pitch­es for mod­ern Friends. It tells us to “be pat­terns” and “walk cheer­ful­ly over the world, answer­ing that of God in every one; where­by in them ye may be a bless­ing, and make the wit­ness of God in them to bless you: then to the Lord God you shall be a sweet savour, and a blessing.”

We’ve tak­en one para­graph from one let­ter as a mis­sion state­ment and now we get peo­ple wring­ing their hands try­ing to rec­on­cile this Pollyanna-style nice­ness with the hor­ror we see in the world. You get Friends valiant­ly try­ing (and most­ly fail­ing) to see “that of God” in ICE agents, ter­ror­ists, or author­i­tar­i­an polit­i­cal leaders.

I think a big part of the prob­lem is that Quak­ers have over­all been a com­fort­able, well-off peo­ple for a long time. We’ve spent much of the last 300 years most­ly remem­ber­ing the happy-feeling stuff. Fox and his fel­low ear­ly Friends were wary of “the world,” see­ing it as a fall­en place that we could tran­scend only with the guid­ance and heal­ing pow­ers of the Liv­ing Christ. Yes, he talked about being pat­terns in that let­ter, but way down. The let­ter actu­al­ly start­ed off in a thun­der­ous man­ner that quite frankly, I think per­haps speaks more clear­ly to our time:

Dwell in the pow­er of life and wis­dom, and dread of the Lord of life, and of heav­en and earth, that you may be pre­served in the wis­dom of God over all, and be a ter­ror and a dread to all the adver­saries of God, answer­ing that of God in them all, spread­ing the truth abroad, awak­en­ing the wit­ness, con­found­ing the deceit, gath­er­ing up out of trans­gres­sion into the life, into the covenant of light and peace with God. Let all nations hear the sound by word or by writ­ing. Spare no place, spare no tongue, nor pen; but be obe­di­ent to the Lord God. Go through the work, and be valiant for the truth upon earth; tread and tram­ple down all that is contrary.

None of this is prac­ti­cal advice for what to do if you see secret police jump out of unmarked van to kid­nap some­one off the street. But what if our edi­tions of Faith and Prac­tice all advised us to a ter­ror and dread and to walk the earth tread­ing and tram­pling on all that is con­trary to divine love? Toward the end of the let­ter, Fox advised us to “be obe­di­ent to the pow­er, for that will save you out of the hands of unrea­son­able men and pre­serve you over the world to him­self.” May it be so.

Oth­er com­men­taries: Simon St. Lau­rent (2007), Stu­art Mas­ters (2016), Mark Wut­ka (2018) and Lewis Ben­son’s bril­liant 1970 essay “ ‘That of God’: What Did George Fox Mean by It?” Also, John Andrew Gallery has a recent Pen­dle Hill pam­phlet on the essay, which I haven’t read but assume is worth reading.

Update: in the Red­dit dis­cus­sion Kei­thB said that he won­dered if there were Quak­ers out there look­ing for jus­ti­fi­ca­tion to tan­gle it up with ICE offi­cers. Pret­ty much as we were talk­ing, word came out that the son of well-known Philly-area Quak­er fam­i­ly being arrest­ed at his home in Port­land, Ore­gon, on sus­pi­cions of par­tic­i­pat­ing in vio­lent anti-ICE protests a few weeks ago.

The pros­e­cu­tors have released a bunch of pic­tures of vio­lent activ­i­ty being per­pe­trat­ed by some­one who looks like the accused, with a sim­i­lar arm tat­too. That pro­tes­tor used a stop sign as a bat­ter­ing ram, and then threw a brick at an ICE agent that hit his head, drew blood, and required med­ical atten­tion. I sure hope it’s not a Quak­er in those pho­tos and that his defense attor­neys can prove it. Tread and tram­pling is not a license for assault.

Jason Kottke reinvents the blogroll

July 24, 2025

I jest. Jason would­n’t use an out­dat­ed metaphor from the last cen­tu­ry like “blogroll.” He’s call­ing it a rolodex instead! (Just polled the 14 year old who has no idea what a rolodex is, naturally).

For those that don’t know, Jason Kot­tke pub­lish­es an old-school blog, almost as old as mine.1 He’s does a great job high­light­ing all sorts of inter­est­ing links and videos and it’s been one of my essen­tial dai­ly reads for a long, long time (I first men­tioned him on my blog 18 years ago). I’m a month­ly sub­scriber, hap­py to give my lit­tle bit.

He’s been exper­i­ment­ing with blog­ging com­mu­ni­ties all this time and there’s a lot of good inno­va­tion con­tin­u­ing late­ly. From the post:

The Rolodex is part of this “strat­e­gy” of relationship-building and strength­en­ing of trust­ed sources of infor­ma­tion. You read­ers are curi­ous about what I read and pay atten­tion to, I enjoy link­ing to things I like (duh), and I believe it’s more impor­tant than ever for those sites who traf­fic in knowl­edge & curios­i­ty and care about humans to acknowl­edge and stand with each oth­er. As I wrote last year, we are not com­peti­tors; we are collaborators

It feels like sites like his are rein­vent­ing the ear­ly 2000s. Social and search are fail­ing us so we’re rein­vent­ing blog rolls (a blog author’s list of favorite sites). It was fun watch­ing this build organ­i­cal­ly back in the day but I won­der if we can recap­ture the magic.

The com­ments thread on my per­son­al blog used to be a live­ly back-and-forth, with a sol­id com­mu­ni­ty of reg­u­lars and a few dozen-or-so active blogs that all linked to one anoth­er. Nowa­days I’m lucky if I get a few com­ments all year. Com­ments are also drop­ping away in the niche-but-longstanding print/online pub­li­ca­tion I work for, espe­cial­ly wor­ri­some as they’ve been basi­cal­ly pow­er­ing our letters-to-the-editor col­umn for the last dozen years. I won­der if peo­ple are just more ret­i­cent to share out­side of estab­lished bulletin-board-esque web­sites (eg Face­book, Red­dit, Sub­stack). Glad to see it’s work­ing on Kottke!

Ready to die for the silence

July 15, 2025

I’m pret­ty used to the stan­dard rhetor­i­cal paths of Quak­er sto­ries after so many years as an edi­tor but every once in a while one comes along and knocks my socks off.

I’ve writ­ten before2 that I’m not a fan of the “when to speak in meet­ing” flow­charts Friends some­times post in the meet­ing­house to dis­cour­age vocal min­istry. One is expect­ed to test an incom­ing mes­sage against half a dozen queries and only speak if they can clear them all in the space of an hour. A lot of new­com­ers see these and decide to just keep quiet.

Chris­tine Hart­mann was just one of these new atten­ders. She writes “after study­ing all this, I decid­ed to hold off speak­ing in meet­ing, if at all pos­si­ble, for fear of get­ting it wrong.” She was so care­ful and so scrupu­lous that her silence almost cost her her life. I’m not kid­ding. Lit­er­al­ly. Read the arti­cle. Wild, wild.

(Yes, there are dis­rup­tive new­com­ers who give inap­pro­pri­ate min­istry in Quak­er wor­ship. In my expe­ri­ence they’re rarely the ones sit­ting down and study­ing flow­charts. The vis­i­tors these charts deter are the care­ful and thought­ful ones who are already tying them­selves in knots won­der­ing whether they should speak. These are the folks you want to encourage.) 

Navigating Gender Transition as a Quaker

July 13, 2025

New from Quak­er­S­peak, an inter­view with Willa Taber:

Joy was my guide­post through my tran­si­tion,” Willa reflects. “I real­ized that at the age of 70, I was too old to post­pone joy. I real­ized short­ly after that that at four years old, I was too old to post­pone joy, but I didn’t know it then.

Willa was one of the reg­u­lar Quak­er blog­gers back in the day3. I had most­ly lost touch, only hear­ing third hand of the tran­si­tion some­where. I’m glad she’s doing well and still wit­ness­ing to the Truth as revealed to her.

What Have Friends Been Reading?

July 12, 2025

There’s a new top-five list of arti­cles from Friends Jour­nal so far in 2025. We have a cou­ple of news ones — the law­suits against DHS and the recent Quak­er Walk — but we also have more con­tem­pla­tive fair.

I like the sto­ry of the Friends at William Penn Uni­ver­si­ty in Iowa dis­cov­er­ing some of the pos­i­tive qual­i­ties of plain dress from a inter­net chal­lenge. And Gail Melix (Greenwater)‘s reflec­tion on being both Quak­er and Indige­nous is quite moving.

Influencing Quakers

July 2, 2025

Philadel­phia Year­ly Meet­ing and Friends in Busi­ness spon­sored a two-person pan­el last night called “Quak­er Voic­es, Dig­i­tal Paths” and fea­tur­ing Glo­ria Sul­li­van, who has over 600,000 fol­low­ers across Tik­Tok and Insta­gram, and Grif­fin Macaulay, con­tent cre­ator for Dun­geons and Drag­ons. Glo­ria does­n’t gen­er­al­ly talk about being a Quak­er on her chan­nel but did in Jan­u­ary. It’s had over 300,000 views and a stag­ger­ing 6,042 comments. 

The scale of the new­er forms of online media is real­ly stag­ger­ing, as is the sim­plic­i­ty of start­ing a chan­nel. There’s no need to incor­po­rate or find fun­ders or write mis­sion state­ments: you just start talk­ing to the com­put­er. It quick­ly becomes all-consuming of course, and there’s a lot of thought that goes into the top­ics and scope of the chan­nel. All the pop­u­lar Tik­Toks also have lots of edits to speed them up. It’s a lot of work to do this part or full-time.

Grif­fin talked about being known for a thing and remain­ing pas­sion­ate about it even in a vac­u­um. It’s the follow-your-passion advice: lov­ing what you do will pull peo­ple to you and you will find a way to turn it into a business.

In some ways, I feel that at least some of the work my col­leagues and I are doing 4is akin to an out­field­er scan­ning the sky for pop balls com­ing in from these inter­net men­tions. When a pop­u­lar influ­encer talks about Quak­ers I’m sure hun­dreds of fin­gers open a new tab to ask “What is a Quak­er?” and “What Do Quak­ers Believe?” We hope­ful­ly show up in the search with easily-digestible answers and links to Quak­er com­mu­ni­ties. I asked Glo­ria and Grif­fin for ideas about how we could bet­ter sup­port inquir­ers they might send our way. We’re doing a lot already — good search engine opti­miza­tion, catchy URLs — but there was some good advice on using Insta­gram bet­ter and real­ly sim­pli­fy­ing our mes­sag­ing and turn­ing it into stories. 

Vegetarian Author John Robbins Dies at 77

July 2, 2025

An obit to the vegetarian-promoting author of Diet for a New Amer­i­ca. The book came out when I was an very active activist in col­lege. My pri­ma­ry moti­va­tion to become veg­e­tar­i­an was gut lev­el — why kill ani­mals for food when you don’t have to? — but Rob­bin­s’s book gave an intel­lec­tu­al back­bone I found con­vinc­ing and I appre­ci­at­ed learn­ing about the envi­ron­men­tal and health aspects of a veg­e­tar­i­an diet (as I’ve grown old­er, the lat­ter feel even more important).

Great detail at the end:

In the late 1980s, his son said, John Rob­bins rec­on­ciled with his father: Irv Rob­bins, suf­fer­ing from weight issues, heart dis­ease and dia­betes, was giv­en a copy of “Diet for a New Amer­i­ca” by his car­di­ol­o­gist. The doc­tor had no idea that the book had been writ­ten by his patient’s son.

Veg News also has an arti­cle on his life and impact.

TV wars

June 25, 2025

Hav­ing start­ed out my blog­ging life as a writer on non­vi­o­lence, I must admit it’s hard to real­ly respond to this week’s mil­i­tary actions with the grav­i­ty they deserve. Quak­er orga­ni­za­tions like AFSC and FCNL are speak­ing out, as they must (“We must act now” and “You can’t bomb your way to peace”) but I can’t get over just how much the­ater this all is. Pres­i­dent Trump gave Iran advance warn­ing of the incom­ing bunker bombs, plen­ty of time for Iran to get its stock­piles of near-weapons-grade mate­r­i­al out of har­m’s way. When Iran retal­i­at­ed with mis­siles against U.S. bases in Qatar, they too gave advance warn­ing, giv­ing the U.S. anti-missile defens­es the heads-up need­ed to defend and destroy the incom­ing barrage.

In reports, Trump is said to have decid­ed on the Iran attack in part because he felt Israel was get­ting such “good press” for its attacks against Iran (not sur­pris­ing­ly, he fix­ates on Fox News cov­er­age, which was all-in for Netanyahu’s attacks). U.S. mil­i­tary intel­li­gence says the attacks on For­do, Iran’s pri­ma­ry nuclear-enrichment site, only delayed a pos­si­ble cre­ation of a nuclear weapon by months. Why gen­er­ate such ill-will for such a tem­po­rary advantage?

Of course, would we even be in this mess if Trump had­n’t scut­tled the hard-won nego­ti­a­tions of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal frame­work. Even at the time it seemed like Trump was most­ly act­ing out of jeal­ousy that a long-term solu­tion had been the result of his pre­de­ces­sor’s work. There does­n’t seem to be any over­ar­ch­ing log­ic to any of this. It’s all for the TV cov­er­age (the rest of the world’s lead­ers seem to have fig­ured this out). Is there a real­ly an end-game to Israel assas­si­nat­ing so much of Iran­ian lead­er­ship, includ­ing some of the very peo­ple who were nego­ti­at­ing deals? And in the midst of this, a real solu­tion to the Pales­tin­ian — Israel con­flict seems fur­ther away than ever.

Peace­ful con­duct is the best way to set up peace­ful res­o­lu­tions. Iran has always been a coun­try with poten­tial. Encour­ag­ing it to give up nuclear and ter­ror­is­tic ambi­tions, promis­ing it last­ing safe­ty, and slow­ly inte­grat­ing it back into the world econ­o­my is real­ly a win-win for all sides. So why all this the­ater? What’s the end plan any­way? Or is that such a naive thing to even ask in 2025?