Turning Weapons into Peace: My Interview with Scotty Utz

September 14, 2026

I inter­viewed Sep­tem­ber FJ author Scot­ty Utz about Guns-to-Garden Move­ment. Fas­ci­nat­ing wit­ness and some heart­break­ing sto­ries. From my intro:

One of the most pro­found and oft quot­ed state­ments from prob­a­bly the entire Bible is from Isa­iah, and it goes And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many peo­ple, and they shall beat their swords into plough shares, and their spears into prun­ing hooks. Nations shall not lift up sword against nation, nei­ther shall they learn war any more. And this may seem like a won­der­ful lyri­cal kind of state­ment. But what if we actu­al­ly took it seri­ous­ly and actu­al­ly start­ed tak­ing our instru­ments of war and turn­ing them into prun­ing hooks?

Full show notes and tran­scrip­tions here.

“Creationtide” and the Seasons of the Church and Earth

September 6, 2026

A beau­ti­ful med­i­ta­tion by Bri­an Dray­ton on Quak­ers soft­en­ing on the ideas of times and sea­sons and how he (and I sus­pect many oth­er Friends) have come to more ful­ly embrace the sea­sons of both the wider Chris­t­ian Church and also the nat­ur­al sea­sons of the earth and cosmos.

Cesar Chavez and me

March 19, 2026

Wow, so stunned to read the reports of Cesar Chavez abus­ing young girls and rap­ing Unit­ed Farm Work­er VP Dolores Huer­ta.

In the mid-80s I was one of the many ide­al­is­tic col­lege kids who interned with the UFW for a sum­mer. I got to hang out with him a num­ber of times. His son-in-law ran the NYC-based media cam­paign and Cesar would come for plan­ning meet­ings but also to vis­it his daugh­ter and grand­kids. She made great cheese enchi­ladas and all of us would talk late into the night as he told stories.

I do remem­ber think­ing — and ask­ing — why the saint­ed VP Dolores Huer­ta nev­er actu­al­ly seemed all that involved, at least not to the point of ever com­ing East that sum­mer to par­tic­i­pate in NYC-based media strat­e­gy meet­ings. It was explained she was need­ed back in Cal­i­for­nia.1 I nev­er met her. I remem­ber not being sur­prised at all that she did­n’t ascend to the UFW pres­i­den­cy when Cesar died. It went instead to the son-in-law who had led our office.

My direct super­vi­sor was a schlub and sex­ist pig. He was always mak­ing inap­pro­pri­ate­ly sug­ges­tive com­ments to the young female interns, which they uni­ver­sal­ly laughed off. They were all smart, con­fi­dent women with futures who weren’t going to be put off by him. I was the only male intern that sum­mer and he put me in shit­ty assign­ments, pres­sur­ing me to drop out. I assume I was seen as com­pe­ti­tion and indeed I did start dat­ing a fel­low intern (the only rea­son I put up with his behav­ior and made it through the sum­mer). I see he’s still with the UFW, now list­ed as first vice pres­i­dent, which is not at all inspiring.

It was per­haps the most dys­func­tion­al office cul­ture I’ve ever seen. The union’s influ­ence had obvi­ous­ly declined since the heady days of RFK march­ing with Cesar in huge ral­lies. They seemed to jump from fad to fad hop­ing to recap­ture atten­tion. That year direct mar­ket­ing was all the rage in busi­ness cir­cles and the UFW was jump­ing in with both feet. We would spend hours in meet­ings set­ting unre­al­is­tic expec­ta­tions, then break our own guide­lines to “meet” them. I’d be called out for try­ing to do things the way we had agreed. I remem­ber won­der­ing if any of the office work I did that sum­mer actu­al­ly made a jot of dif­fer­ence. Help­ing to orga­nize East Coast appear­ances of Cesar was def­i­nite­ly the high­light of the sum­mer — well, that and the girl­friend and get­ting to hang out in New York City all the time.

I do have to won­der now if some of the dys­func­tion and sex­ism in the office was ulti­mate­ly relat­ed to Cesar’s repeat­ed molesta­tion of chil­dren.2 Did he fos­ter a cul­ture in which we laughed off bad behav­ior and did­n’t ques­tion poor management?

NYTimes inves­ti­ga­tion

Tim Gee tracks down Ann Lee’s Quaker connection

March 17, 2026

I always love a lit­tle sleuthing and all the bet­ter if it argues against some poor­ly researched report that made its way to Wikipedia.

The claim is that Shak­er leader Ann Lee was born a Quak­er. The Wikipedia entry says: “Her par­ents were mem­bers of a dis­tinct branch of the Soci­ety of Friends (a sect of Quak­ers) and too poor to afford their chil­dren even the rudi­ments of edu­ca­tion.” The source of this is giv­en in the cita­tion: a 1879 ency­clo­pe­dia arti­cle, a copy of which is host­ed on Wik­isource: “Her par­ents were mem­bers of a dis­tinct branch of the soci­ety of Friends, and too poor to afford their chil­dren even the rudi­ments of edu­ca­tion.” A source for this claim was nev­er giv­en in the ency­clo­pe­dia, though lat­er on it does ref­er­ence Fred­er­ick William Evans, a much lat­er Shak­er figure.

That is the Tim Gee com­piles five pieces of evi­dence that togeth­er feel very con­vinc­ing.

There are of course influ­ences but that’s to be expect­ed. Every reli­gious move­ment of the Sec­ond Great Awak­en­ing had some rela­tion­ship to Quak­ers. The Methodists, Mor­mons, Holi­ness, Adven­tists all have some con­nec­tions. When you tour the “1652 Coun­try” area of Eng­land, where George Fox first brought Quak­ers togeth­er, you’ll keep run­ning into signs about John Wes­ley doing the same for Methodists a cen­tu­ry lat­er, and here in South Jer­sey where I live a whole slew of Quak­ers became Methodists in the ear­ly 1800s. At least one ear­ly Mor­mon evan­ge­list in Ohio essen­tial­ly went from Quak­er town to Quak­er town try­ing to recruit peo­ple. The Quak­er defense of female lead­er­ship and the prin­ci­ple that women can preach obvi­ous­ly rubbed off on the Shak­ers and oth­er movements.

The idea that the British colonies in Amer­i­ca were some pure land where we could rein­vent a prim­i­tive Chris­tian­i­ty was a pow­er­ful meme (if you will) at the time and cer­tain­ly drew Ann Lee to cross over and plant a reli­gious move­ment here. But Ann Lee picked one of the least Quak­er areas to plant her com­mu­ni­ty and drew ear­ly mem­bers from New Eng­land mil­len­ni­al­ist revival­ists. She def­i­nite­ly want­ed to build some­thing dis­tinct from Friends.

www.friendsjournal.org www​.friend​sjour​nal​.org

March 29: A Quaker Trans Day of Visibility Gathering

March 10, 2026

Ten authors fea­tured in the March 2026 Friends Jour­nal spe­cial issue on gen­der and sex­u­al iden­ti­ties join trans and non­bi­na­ry mod­er­a­tors for facil­i­tat­ed con­ver­sa­tion. Free and both online at at Swarth­more Col­lege. Learn more here.

I wrote the intro­duc­to­ry col­umn for this issue. Here’s a taste:

am grate­ful that both our reli­gious soci­ety and wider cul­ture have devel­oped a greater under­stand­ing of the diver­si­ty of gen­der expres­sions. I appre­ci­ate an expand­ed vocab­u­lary with which to include peo­ple. (Only ten years ago the sin­gu­lar “they” was still cau­tioned against in the Friends Jour­nal style guide!) Change can be con­fus­ing and bewil­der­ing, but open con­ver­sa­tions between Friends one-on-one and in set­tings like a clear­ness com­mit­tee can help us under­stand one anoth­er in our long­ing to be known and loved.

You can read the whole issue on Friends Jour­nal.

A Quaker Trans Day of Visibility Gathering: A free online & in person event for Friends A Quak­er Trans Day of Vis­i­bil­i­ty Gath­er­ing: A free online & in per­son event for Friends 

What Do Quakers Believe?

December 1, 2025

How’s the old joke go? Ask five Quak­ers what they believe and you’ll get ten answers. Undaunt­ed, Decem­ber’s Friends Jour­nal tries to give some answers to the ques­tion any­way. I very much hope that indi­vid­ual Friends will find view­points they real­ly like as well as ones they real­ly don’t like, or at least don’t agree with. That there are no pat answers is itself part of the answer to the question.

Bonus: we’ve been work­ing on expand­ing our inter­na­tion­al inclu­sion in the mag­a­zine and an arti­cle from Sal­vado­ran Jas­son Areva­lo on the role of Quak­er pas­tors is the first fruits of our new Latin Amer­i­can cor­re­spon­den­t’s out­reach efforts.

blank

Elizabeth Spiers on Early Blogging

October 24, 2025

She describes a dif­fer­ent time, indeed.

Ear­ly blog­ging was slow­er, less behold­en to the hourly news cycle, and peo­ple were more inclined to talk about per­son­al enthu­si­asms as well as what was going on in the world because blogs were con­sid­ered an indi­vid­ual enter­prise, not nec­es­sar­i­ly akin to a reg­u­lar publication.

I appre­ci­ate her com­ments on invest­ed read­ers. The num­ber of peo­ple who were part of the “Quak­er blo­gos­phere” back in day was not that large but some­thing about the cru­cible of the writ­ing and debat­ing meant that they devel­oped ideas that have out­sized influ­ence today. The same sorts of con­ver­sa­tions con­tin­ue to hap­pen today in cor­ners of Face­book, Red­dit, and Dis­cord but there’s not the same sort of feel­ing of shared community.

Christ and Creation this Saturday

October 16, 2025

I men­tioned this back in May but there’s still time to join “Christ and Cre­ation: Illu­mi­nate Bible Study” this Sat­ur­day, Octo­ber 18, an online Bible study co-sponsored by Bar­clay Press and the Pen­dle Hill and Wood­brooke study cen­ters. I’ll be one of the pan­elists talking. 

It’s pay-as-led so come join us if you’re avail­able. When it starts depends on where you are of course. It’s 11:00 am here on the U.S. East Coast, which trans­lates to 4pm UK time and 8am Pacif­ic Time. It will last about two hours. You can sign up with either Wood­brooke or Pen­dle Hill.

This is based on the Illu­mi­nate Bible study cur­ricu­lum put out by Bar­clay Press. I wrote for the issue on “Christ in Cre­ation,” which you can pur­chase as a phys­i­cal or elec­tron­ic book.

blank
I don’t know what my Luther­an grand­moth­er would make of see­ing my name on a Bible cur­ricu­lum. She always judged my mom for not church­ing me and had a bit of a sneer when she would describe me as a “Bible illit­er­ate” right in front of me.