Young adults profiled in publications

December 7, 2025

Two recent arti­cles in pub­li­ca­tions have got­ten some buzz. One writ­ten by AP reporter Luis Andres Henao looks at a rise of young adult inter­est in Friends and pro­files a dra­mat­ic increase in atten­dance at Arch Street Meet­ing in Philadel­phia. It’s been reprint­ed in a lot of news­pa­pers. It quotes a Valerie Goodman:

“It feels like I can have a minute to breathe. It’s dif­fer­ent than hav­ing a moment of med­i­ta­tion in my apart­ment because there’s still all of the dis­trac­tions around,” Good­man says. “And it’s crazy being in a room full of oth­er peo­ple that are all there to expe­ri­ence that themselves.”

The oth­er is a beau­ti­ful essay by a new UK Friend, who explains the appeal of the silence:

It was as if some­one had turned down the vol­ume of the world, and all that remained was my feel­ings, sit­ting raw and open like a wound. Rather than run­ning, I sat for an hour and let them wash over me. I left with a fresh­er per­spec­tive and spent the rest of the day in a calm daze. For the first time in a while, I felt anchored to some­thing greater than myself.

Tread and Trample

July 26, 2025

Over on Red­dit, a dis­cus­sion try­ing to square our oft-quoted advice to see “that of God” with the arrival of secret police on U.S. streets.

I don’t think Quak­ers’ his­tor­i­cal mem­o­ry always serves us very well. In 1656, George Fox wrote a let­ter from Launce­s­ton Gaol, a por­tion of which is quot­ed in every edi­tion of Faith and Prac­tice. It’s been repro­duced as giant posters and the key phrase has become one of the go-to ele­va­tor pitch­es for mod­ern Friends. It tells us to “be pat­terns” and “walk cheer­ful­ly over the world, answer­ing that of God in every one; where­by in them ye may be a bless­ing, and make the wit­ness of God in them to bless you: then to the Lord God you shall be a sweet savour, and a blessing.”

We’ve tak­en one para­graph from one let­ter as a mis­sion state­ment and now we get peo­ple wring­ing their hands try­ing to rec­on­cile this Pollyanna-style nice­ness with the hor­ror we see in the world. You get Friends valiant­ly try­ing (and most­ly fail­ing) to see “that of God” in ICE agents, ter­ror­ists, or author­i­tar­i­an polit­i­cal leaders.

I think a big part of the prob­lem is that Quak­ers have over­all been a com­fort­able, well-off peo­ple for a long time. We’ve spent much of the last 300 years most­ly remem­ber­ing the happy-feeling stuff. Fox and his fel­low ear­ly Friends were wary of “the world,” see­ing it as a fall­en place that we could tran­scend only with the guid­ance and heal­ing pow­ers of the Liv­ing Christ. Yes, he talked about being pat­terns in that let­ter, but way down. The let­ter actu­al­ly start­ed off in a thun­der­ous man­ner that quite frankly, I think per­haps speaks more clear­ly to our time:

Dwell in the pow­er of life and wis­dom, and dread of the Lord of life, and of heav­en and earth, that you may be pre­served in the wis­dom of God over all, and be a ter­ror and a dread to all the adver­saries of God, answer­ing that of God in them all, spread­ing the truth abroad, awak­en­ing the wit­ness, con­found­ing the deceit, gath­er­ing up out of trans­gres­sion into the life, into the covenant of light and peace with God. Let all nations hear the sound by word or by writ­ing. Spare no place, spare no tongue, nor pen; but be obe­di­ent to the Lord God. Go through the work, and be valiant for the truth upon earth; tread and tram­ple down all that is contrary.

None of this is prac­ti­cal advice for what to do if you see secret police jump out of unmarked van to kid­nap some­one off the street. But what if our edi­tions of Faith and Prac­tice all advised us to a ter­ror and dread and to walk the earth tread­ing and tram­pling on all that is con­trary to divine love? Toward the end of the let­ter, Fox advised us to “be obe­di­ent to the pow­er, for that will save you out of the hands of unrea­son­able men and pre­serve you over the world to him­self.” May it be so.

Oth­er com­men­taries: Simon St. Lau­rent (2007), Stu­art Mas­ters (2016), Mark Wut­ka (2018) and Lewis Ben­son’s bril­liant 1970 essay “ ‘That of God’: What Did George Fox Mean by It?” Also, John Andrew Gallery has a recent Pen­dle Hill pam­phlet on the essay, which I haven’t read but assume is worth reading.

Update: in the Red­dit dis­cus­sion Kei­thB said that he won­dered if there were Quak­ers out there look­ing for jus­ti­fi­ca­tion to tan­gle it up with ICE offi­cers. Pret­ty much as we were talk­ing, word came out that the son of well-known Philly-area Quak­er fam­i­ly being arrest­ed at his home in Port­land, Ore­gon, on sus­pi­cions of par­tic­i­pat­ing in vio­lent anti-ICE protests a few weeks ago.

The pros­e­cu­tors have released a bunch of pic­tures of vio­lent activ­i­ty being per­pe­trat­ed by some­one who looks like the accused, with a sim­i­lar arm tat­too. That pro­tes­tor used a stop sign as a bat­ter­ing ram, and then threw a brick at an ICE agent that hit his head, drew blood, and required med­ical atten­tion. I sure hope it’s not a Quak­er in those pho­tos and that his defense attor­neys can prove it. Tread and tram­pling is not a license for assault.

The Religious SocieChildren of Prophets or Children of Propheticide?

February 19, 2019

A stren­u­ous­ly and lengthi­ly argued dun­ci­a­tion of the fal­l­en­ness of mod­ern Friends, this piece is argued almost exclu­sive­ly from books. It’s inter­est­ing (and much of it is unde­ni­ably true) though the author seem unable to imag­ine thst there might be some sparks of authen­tic­i­ty and propheti­cism still burning.

The fol­low­ing post was writ­ten by Blake Everitt, a Friend the UK and mem­ber of the newly-formed Rev­o­lu­tion­ary Quak­ers. This essay explores the prophet­ic and apoc­a­lyp­tic nature of ear­ly Quak­erism, and sketch­es out how mid­dle class revi­sion­ism took over the Reli­gious Soci­ety of Friends. 

The Reli­gious Soci­ety of Friends: Chil­dren of Prophets or Chil­dren of Propheticide?

The Rise of Liberal Quakerism

May 23, 2018

Steven Davi­son is nerd­ing deep into Quak­er his­to­ry, specif­i­cal­ly the process in which younger mem­bers of Britain Year­ly Meet­ing start­ed for­mu­lat­ing a new kind of Quak­erism. Here’s his explana­to­ry intro­duc­tion and here is part 2:

Mean­while, mem­ber­ship dropped pre­cip­i­tous­ly, as meet­ings applied dis­ci­pline increas­ing­ly rig­or­ous­ly for walk­ing dis­or­der­ly in all man­ner of ways. In 1859, a prize of one hun­dred pounds was offered by an anony­mous British Friend for the essay that best explained this decline and that offered the most promis­ing solutions

The process was any­thing but overnight. As I under­stand the his­to­ry it would be anoth­er half cen­tu­ry from the prize to a yearly-meeting-wide shift. I don’t think many Friends in Eng­land appre­ci­ate just how Evan­gel­i­cal their year­ly meet­ing has become in these years; their refusal to rec­og­nize Amer­i­can Hick­sites led to the lat­ter’s shun­ning from the world Quak­er fam­i­ly and meant mod­ernist Quak­er respons­es would evolve on large­ly sep­a­rate paths.

I won­der if British Friend William Pol­lard will make an appear­ance in Steven’s posts. I’ve been fas­ci­nat­ed how Philadel­phia Hick­sites took to him despite the for­mal insti­tu­tion­al bar­ri­ers. [Update: Steven just dropped part three and there’s Pol­lard!]

The Rise of Lib­er­al Quak­erism — Part 2

Belief, Faith, and “That of God”

April 3, 2018

Long-time Quak­er blog­ger Mark Wut­ka won­ders if we’ve inad­ver­tent­ly brought back in a doc­tri­nal state­ment with our easy response to the ques­tion of Quak­er belief:

Do Friends today have faith and trust in ‘that of God’ in every per­son? Are we striv­ing to answer ‘that of God’ in oth­ers, and do we have the faith that doing so may even­tu­al­ly bring them away from evil? I ask this because much of the dis­course today seems to ignore this.

“That of God in every­one” is one of those phras­es that many traditional-leaning Friends have found a bit prob­lem­at­ic over the years. Quak­er co-founder George Fox used it, but spar­ing­ly. It does­n’t even appear in his Jour­nal. If you were look­ing for an “ele­va­tor pitch” of his beliefs, I would go with his spir­i­tu­al open­ing that there is one, even Christ Jesus, who can speak to our con­di­tion. The most well-argued (per­haps over-argued) expose of “that of God” as a latter-day Quak­er over­lay came from Lewis Ben­son’s famous essay from 1970, ‘That of God in Every Man” — What Did George Fox Mean by It?

In the sec­ond half of the piece Mark asks whether our belief of that of God leads us to act dif­fer­ent­ly in the polit­i­cal sphere. He strug­gles with this, as do I, and as do pre­sum­ably all of us. I wor­ry par­tic­u­lar­ly about judg­ing the way Friends act; when­ev­er I see some­one share a hard truth, I know I’ll quick­ly see some­one else cri­tique them for being too divi­sive, too “unQuak­er­ly.”

Jesus famous­ly over­turned the mon­ey chang­ers and Ben­jamin Lay spilled pig blood in year­ly meet­ing ses­sions. Maybe the only guide we have is the active Guide. Maybe our order­ly walk­ing will look alter­na­tive­ly meek or divi­sive depend­ing on the cues we’re giv­en. And maybe we’ll be mis­un­der­stood even as we’re being the most faithful.

Mark fin­ish­es:

For now, I am striv­ing to walk in the Light as best I can and man­i­fest the fruit of the Spir­it in my inter­ac­tions with people

Remembering Juanita Nelson

March 10, 2015

juanita04One of the coolest activists of her (or any) gen­er­a­tion is gone. Juani­ta Nel­son’s obit­u­ary is up on the nation­al war tax coali­tion’s site. My favorite Juani­ta sto­ry was when some agents came to arrest her at home and found her dressed only in a bathrobe. They told her it was okay to go into her bed­room to change but she refused. She told them that any shame was theirs. She forced them to car­ry her out as her clothes fell off. Talk about rad­i­cal non-cooperation!

Update

Pam McAl­lis­ter point­ed out on her Glob­al Non­vi­o­lence: Sto­ries of Cre­ative Action Face­book page that this sto­ry is online. Here’s a bit more of Juani­ta her­self telling that bit:

Sev­en law enforce­ment offi­cers had stalked in. I sat on the stool beneath the tele­phone, my back lit­er­al­ly to the wall, the sev­en hem­ming me about in a semi­cir­cle. All of them appeared over six feet tall, and all of them were annoyed.

“Look,” said one, “you’re gonna go any­way. You might as well come peaceful.”

There they stood, ready and able to take me at any moment. But no move was made. The rea­son was obvious.

“Why don’t you put your clothes on, Mrs. Nel­son?” This was a soft spo­ken plea from the more benign deputy. “You’re not hurt­ing any­body but your­self.” His pained expres­sion belied the assertion. 

The essay where that came from is much longer and well worth read­ing.

The Early Blogging Days

June 17, 2005

I start­ed Non​vi​o​lence​.org in late 1995 as a place to pub­li­cize the work of the US peace move­ment which was not get­ting out to a wide (or a young) audi­ence. I built and main­tained the web­sites of a few dozen host­ed groups (includ­ing the War Resisters League, Fel­low­ship of Rec­on­cil­i­a­tion and Pax Christi USA) but I quick­ly real­ized that the Non​vi​o​lence​.org home­page itself could be used for more than just as a place to put links to mem­ber groups. I could use it to high­light the arti­cles I thought should get more pub­lic­i­ty, whether on or off the Non​vi​o​lence​.org domain.

The home­page adapt­ed into what is now a rec­og­niz­able blog for­mat on Novem­ber 13, 1997 when I re-named the home­page “Non­vi­o­lence Web Upfront” and start­ed post­ing links to inter­est­ing arti­cles from Non​vi​o​lence​.org mem­ber groups. In response to a com­ment the oth­er day I won­dered how that fit in with the evo­lu­tion of blog­ging. I was shocked to learn from Wikipedi­a’s that the term “weblog” was­n’t coined until Decem­ber of that year. I think is less a coin­ci­dence than a con­fir­ma­tion that many of us were try­ing to fig­ure out a for­mat for shar­ing the web with others.

blank

The ear­li­est edi­tion stored on Archive​.org is from Decem­ber 4, 1997. It focused on the hun­dredth anniver­sary of the birth of Catholic Work­er co-founder Dorothy Day. To give you an sense of the ear­ly independently-published arti­cles, the Jan­u­ary 2, 1998 edi­tion includ­ed a guest piece by John Steitz, “Is the Non­vi­o­lence Web a Move­ment Half-Way House” that sounds eeri­ly sim­i­lar to recent dis­cus­sions on Quak­er Ranter.

Below is an excerpt from the email announce­ment for “Non­vi­o­lence Web Upfront” (typ­i­cal­ly for me, I sent it out after I had been run­ning the new for­mat for awhile):

NONVIOLENCE WEB NEWS, by Mar­tin Kel­ley Week of Decem­ber 29, 1997

CONTENTS

Intro­duc­ing “Non­vi­o­lence Web Upfront”

New Pro­ce­dures
New Web­site #1: SERPAJ
New Web­site #2: Stop the Cassi­ni Fly­by
Two Awards
Num­bers Avail­able Upon Request
Week­ly Vis­i­tor Counts

With my trav­el­ling and hol­i­day sched­ule, it’s been hard to keep reg­u­lar NVWeb News updates com­ing along, but it’s been a great month and there’s a lot. I’m espe­cial­ly proud of the con­tin­u­ing evo­lu­tion of what I’m now call­ing “Non­vi­o­lence Web Upfront,” seen by 1800 – 2200 peo­ple a month!


INTRODUCING “NONVIOLENCE WEB UPFRONT”

The new mag­a­zine for­mat of the NVWe­b’s home­page has been need­ing a name. It need­ed to men­tioned the “Non­vi­o­lence Web” and I want­ed it to imply that it was the site’s home­page (some­times referred to as a “front­page”) and that it con­tained mate­r­i­al tak­en from the sites of the NVWeb.

So the name is “Non­vi­o­lence Web Upfront” and a trip to http://​www​.non​vi​o​lence​.org will see that spelled out big on top of the weekly-updated articles.

There’s also an archive of the week­ly install­ments found at the bot­tom of NVWeb Upfront. It’s quite a good col­lec­tion already!

Now that this is mov­ing for­ward, I encour­age every­one to think about how they might con­tribute arti­cles. If you write an inter­est­ing opin­ion piece, essay, or sto­ry that you think would fit, send it along to me. For exam­ple, “War Toys: Re-Action-ist Fig­ures” FOR’s Vin­cent Romano’s piece from the Nov. 27 edi­tion, was an essay he had already writ­ten and made a good com­pli­men­ta­ry piece for the Youth­Peace Week spe­cial. But don’t wor­ry about themes: NVWeb Upfront is meant not only to be time­ly but to show the breadth of the non­vi­o­lence move­ment, so send your pieces along!