Origin of the Quaker SPICES testimonies

December 20, 2025

If you ask about Quak­er beliefs these days, one of the com­mon answers you’ll get is SPICE, a handy acronym that holds togeth­er a hodge­podge of val­ues, name­ly: sim­plic­i­ty, peace, integri­ty, com­mu­ni­ty and equal­i­ty (and lat­er sus­tain­abil­i­ty to become SPICES). One Quak­er school defin­i­tive­ly puts it, “Quak­ers agree to a core set of val­ues, known as tes­ti­monies.” I’ve not found SPICES list­ed before 2000 and even many of the indi­vid­ual com­po­nents are absent from old­er books of Faith and Practice.

The ques­tion of where this ubiq­ui­tous acronym came from, and when, reg­u­lar­ly comes up in Quak­er dis­course (most­ly recent­ly on Red­dit here). I some­times answer with the bits I’ve dug up but rather than rein­vent­ing the wheel each time, I thought I’d write it all down. I invite peo­ple to add what they know in com­ments and I’ll edit this.

1940s

Howard Brin­ton was the inven­tor of our mod­ern idea of a “tes­ti­mo­ny” in the 1940s, and his orig­i­nal list was com­mu­ni­ty, har­mo­ny, equal­i­ty, and sim­plic­i­ty. He was the Philadelphia-area born Friend who helped orga­nize unpro­grammed Friends on the U.S. West Coast in the ear­ly part of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry. Brin­ton had a knack for sim­ple expla­na­tions that expressed the emerg­ing con­sen­sus of a new gen­er­a­tion of Friends who were heal­ing from the nineteenth-century schisms. Find­ing new ways of talk­ing about our com­mon­al­i­ties was a cen­tral part of the work of rec­on­cil­i­a­tion. From his tour de force 1952 mas­ter­piece, Friends for 300 Years:

The mean­ing of the group in Quak­er prac­tice can be sug­gest­ed by a dia­gram. Light from God streams down into the wait­ing group. This Light, if the way is open for it, pro­duces three results: uni­ty, knowl­edge, and pow­er. As a result we have the kind of behav­ior which exists as an ide­al in a meet­ing for wor­ship and a meet­ing for busi­ness. Because of the char­ac­ter­is­tics of the Light of Christ, the result­ing behav­ior can be described in a gen­er­al way by the four words Com­mu­ni­ty, Har­mo­ny, Equal­i­ty, and Sim­plic­i­ty.…

He includ­ed a chart, which hon­est­ly does­n’t help much with my under­stand­ing of the meta­physics of it all.

1975

Read­er Tomas Mario Kalmar sent me a paper called Learn­ing Com­mu­ni­ty pre­pared by the Edu­ca­tion Com­mis­sion of Aus­tralian Year­ly Meet­ing that lists six “char­ac­ter­is­tics that dis­tin­guished Quak­er edu­ca­tion”: a reli­gious­ly guard­ed edu­ca­tion, com­mu­ni­ty, non-violence, equal­i­ty, sim­plic­i­ty, and an expe­ri­en­tial cur­ricu­lum. The list is large­ly based on Howard Brin­ton’s work but I include it here because it shows how Friends were remix­ing and repur­pos­ing his list. Learn­ing Com­mu­ni­ty actu­al­ly looks pret­ty good and fair­ly time­less and Tomas gave me per­mis­sion to repost the PDF here.

1980 – 90s

In a Red­dit thread a few years ago, macoafi wrote: “My in-laws were chil­dren in first day school in the 1980s and 1990s, and they learned 4 tes­ti­monies, no acronym. (Peace, truth, sim­plic­i­ty, equal­i­ty).” At some point Brin­ton’s har­mo­ny start­ed being called peace so this is most­ly his list except for truth being swapped for com­mu­ni­ty.

1981

Com­menter Sharon writes:

I first heard SPICE at the 1981 FGC gath­er­ing in Berea KY! At the time it didn’t sit well with me as I found it too glib. I was still work­ing out what God want­ed my life to tes­ti­fy too.

This would put it near­ly two decades before from any doc­u­ment­ed instance I’ve seen. It is also well before any instance I’ve seen that includ­ed an I for integri­ty. I admit I’ll remain skep­ti­cal until I see fur­ther evi­dence, though it is pos­si­ble that some­one remem­bered it from the Berea gath­er­ing and start­ed reusing it in the last 1990s.1

1990

Wilmer Coop­er was an Ohio Wilbu­rite Friend who went on to become first dean of Earl­ham School of Reli­gion upon its found­ing in 1960. Thir­ty years lat­er he pub­lished A Liv­ing Faith, which was built on an ESR course called Basic Quak­er Beliefs. In the pref­ace he writes: “It is my hope that this work will help Friends gain a fuller under­stand­ing of their Quak­er her­itage and the­o­log­i­cal roots, while pro­vid­ing for non-Quakers a com­pre­hen­sive answer to the ques­tions: ‘Who are the Quak­ers?’ and “What is Quak­erism?’ ” In its final chap­ter Coop­er has two lists, which each have four tes­ti­monies. His reli­gious tes­ti­monies are:

  • belief that we can have direct and imme­di­ate access to the liv­ing God;
  • we can no only know the will of God but can, by God’s grace, be enabled to do the will of God.
  • the Quak­er expe­ri­ence of of com­mu­ni­ty as expressed in the “gath­ered meeting.”
  • the sacra­men­tal view of life.

His social tes­ti­monies are:

  • Peace Tes­ti­mo­ny
  • sim­plic­i­ty
  • equal­i­ty
  • integri­ty

He expands to give a para­graph to each of his eight tes­ti­monies but obvi­ous­ly the sec­ond list is much pithi­er.2. He does say that this isn’t a canon­i­cal list, that dif­fer­ent Friends will have dif­fer­ent lists, and con­cludes the sec­tion on tes­ti­monies by, well, tes­ti­fy­ing: “Friends believe deeply that if they sub­mit them­selves to God and live by the Light of Christ they will be enabled to live by the truth of the Gospel.” It’s worth not­ing that the lat­er SPICE/S for­mu­la­tion did­n’t include any of the reli­gious ones (you could per­haps try to claim com­mu­ni­ty der­vices from his reli­gious tes­ti­monies list but I don’t gen­er­al­ly hear the SPICES C described in the kind of spir­i­tu­al lan­guage Coop­er used).

The next year Coop­er wrote a Pen­dle Hill pam­phlet that focused on integri­ty. As far as I’ve seen Coop­er is the first to include an I for integri­ty, set­ting the stage for our famil­iar acronym.

Mid-1990s

My wife Julie insists that she remem­bers talk of SPICE/S back when she was in high school start­ing to get involved with Friends (cir­ca 1994). She did­n’t attend a Quak­er school so this would have been in Philadel­phia Year­ly Meet­ing cir­cles, prob­a­bly specif­i­cal­ly South Jersey.

Late 1990s

In a com­ment to this very post, Pen­dle Hill edi­tor Jana­ki Spickard Keel­er says that when she was work­ing a 2023 pam­phlet with Paul Buck­ley, they tracked SPICE/S to a Friends Coun­cil for Edu­ca­tion list­serv for edu­ca­tors (per­haps E‑Quakes, which was start­ed in 1996 accord­ing to a FCE his­to­ry). Jana­ki writes: “No one came for­ward as being the first to come up with the idea, but they shared it along them­selves and it spread. They esti­mate this hap­pened around 1998.” The pam­phlet quotes Tom Hoopes, who start­ed as direc­tor of edu­ca­tion for Philadel­phia Year­ly Meet­ing in 1998: “I encoun­tered it in use by one of the month­ly meet­ings of Philadel­phia Year­ly Meet­ing, and I thought to myself, ‘what a great mnemon­ic device for help­ing peo­ple to remem­ber what we Quak­ers claim to pri­or­i­tize, and to try to prac­tice!’” Tom told Jana­ki and Paul that he did­n’t remem­ber the iden­ti­ty of the Friends meeting.

1999

The Sum­mer 1999 edi­tion of Salem Quar­ter (N.J.) News reports that Wood­stown Meet­ing cre­at­ed a SPICE rap in for a First-day School pro­gram which also includ­ed songs from Spice Girls. Yes it’s as unique as it sounds:

What’s the word? SPICE!!!! What’s the word? SPICE IS THE WAY TO GO!!!!
Sim­plic­i­ty is sim­ple, and you know it’s right. Squan­derin’ mon­ey gets ya into a fight.
Peace, it rules, and you know that it’s true. It’s the thing I need to get along with you. Don’t yell and sing those fight­in’ songs, when you can help oth­ers and right their wrongs.
Integri­ty is always bein’ true to your word. It’s the most hon­est tes­ti­mo­ny I’ve ever heard.
Livin’ and a‑sharin’ all together’s real­ly fun. Com­mu­ni­ty is helpin’, workin’, playin’ all in one.
Equal­i­ty means every­one is equal, and that’s cool.
Respect­ing oth­er is what’s right and is the gold­en rule!!

Note that the arti­cle gives a clue on source: “After read­ing a short arti­cle in Philadel­phia Year­ly Meet­ing News with the acronym SPICE high­light­ing the tes­ti­monies… [we] were inspired to incor­po­rate this into our First Day School Pro­gram at Wood­stown MM.” The old­est copy of PYM News avail­able via Archive​.org is tan­ta­liz­ing­ly close — Nov/December 1999. That seems to be when PYM start­ed post­ing its newslet­ter.3

2003

Google finds a PDF of a 2003 talk giv­en to a Uni­tar­i­an Uni­ver­sal­ist church by Salt Lake City Friend Diana Lee Hirschi in 2003 talk­ing about SPICE. 

2004

I myself first com­plained about SPICE in 2004 (note it had­n’t got­ten a sec­ond S yet). I com­plained that this kind of list of sec­u­lar tes­ti­monies were too restric­tive. I real­ly was a Quak­er Ranter back then; also I was real­ly kind of hard on Brin­ton, who I appre­ci­ate more now.

2006

I like to search the Friends Jour­nal archives to see when new terms show up. New terms are often bandied about by par­tic­u­lar Friends or with­in sub-groups, where they might cir­cu­late for a few years with­out get­ting into wider usage. As far as I’ve been able to deter­mine, the first ref­er­ence to SPICES in Friends Jour­nal is a 2006 arti­cle by Har­ri­ett Heath titled “The Quak­er Par­ent­ing Project: A Report.” She’s lays it out as an attempt to teach Quak­er chil­dren with­out resort­ing to dogma:

There are sev­er­al dif­fer­ent lists of tes­ti­monies. We start­ed with one com­mon­ly referred to by the acronym SPICES: Sim­plic­i­ty, Peace, Integri­ty, Com­mu­ni­ty, Equal­i­ty, and Stew­ard­ship — but we found that there were oth­er issues not addressed by this list. Ser­vice is an inte­gral part of Quak­erism in our efforts to live our faith; should it be a tes­ti­mo­ny? Edu­ca­tion has been his­tor­i­cal­ly an inte­gral part of Quak­er­sim; should it, too, be includ­ed? Where does wor­ship — time set apart — fit in?

Her project even­tu­al­ly picked a dif­fer­ent list because they did­n’t want to be bound by the dic­tates of fit­ting into an acronym. They includ­ed con­flict and growth and ser­vice (which some­times is list­ed as the final S).

2007/2008 videos

In 2007, British Friends could pro­duce a video called “The Quak­er Tes­ti­monies” that did­n’t men­tion SPICE/S and ranged over oth­er non-acronymed tes­ti­monies such as one for respect and anoth­er against oath-taking. If you lis­ten care­ful­ly, I think at least one of the speak­ers must have heard of SPICE because he seemed to be orga­niz­ing thoughts around it. 

In 2008 I talked about SPICE and spir­i­tu­al­ly get­ting deep­er with tes­ti­monies in a YouTube video and accom­pa­ny­ing blog post.

2009

Brin­ton schol­ar Antho­ny Manousos did a deep dive on SPICES. Although Antho­ny claims Briton invent­ed SPICES per se, I think he just invent­ed the idea of tes­ti­monies and the ini­tial list that includ­ed three of them (four if you count the harmony/peace change).

2011

Less than two years after Heath’s arti­cle, Mark Dansereau and Kim Tso­canos, the co-heads of Con­necti­cut Friends School in Wilton, Conn., pub­lished an anno­tat­ed list of SPICES in Friends Jour­nal, explain­ing that their school was built on these “Six Quak­er Val­ues” (yes, ital­i­cized and cap­i­tal­ized) and that they applied and wove them into each activ­i­ty in their cur­ric­u­la. This might be one of the old­est fully-intact list­ings still eas­i­ly avail­able on the web. This has become one of the most vis­it­ed pages on Friends Jour­nal website.

2012

By this time SPICE/S was becom­ing ubiq­ui­tous. See this blog post from North­west Year­ly Meet­ing and a video Brent Bill put togeth­er to pro­mote an upcom­ing intro­duc­to­ry work­shop at his meet­ing in Indiana.

Paul Buck­ley gave a talk in 2012 that high­light­ed the role of Wilmer Coop­er, an Ohio Friend per­haps most well remem­bered for found­ing Earl­ham School of Reli­gion in 1960. In 2023, Paul Buck­ley wrote a pam­phlet from Pen­dle Hill, Quak­er Tes­ti­mo­ny: What We Wit­ness to the World, edit­ed by Jana­ki Spickard Keel­er, dur­ing which they deter­mined the late 1990s date.

2013

Some­one around 2006 I was stand­ing in a meal line at a Quak­er event with Cal­i­for­nia Friend Eric Moon and we start­ed to talk about tes­ti­monies. It was the start of a great con­ver­sa­tion, cut short by some inter­rup­tion or anoth­er before we even hit the dessert sta­tion. When I start­ed as Friends Jour­nal edi­tor I asked him to write some­thing. 2013’s Cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly Not the Tes­ti­monies was the result. We also talked in an ear­ly Quak­er Author Pod­cast.


So where did the SPICES for­mu­la­tion come from? It ulti­mate­ly derived from Brin­ton’s list, with har­mo­ny mor­ph­ing to peace and WIl Coop­er’s integri­ty adding an I. Giv­en its ped­a­gog­i­cal nature, it was prob­a­bly coined by edu­ca­tors. It’s a good teach­ing tool, easy to remem­ber and some­thing you can eas­i­ly weave into a multi-week class. 

Since there’s noth­ing par­tic­u­lar­ly reli­gious about the SPICE/S list, it can work in an essen­tial­ly sec­u­lar envi­ron­ment that might be aller­gic to religious-sounding Quak­er the­ol­o­gy. This would include Friends schools appeal­ing to a non-Quaker audi­ence or a Lib­er­al Friends Meet­ing that wants some­thing non-controversial to teach the kids. I nev­er hear any­one talk about it being derived from “char­ac­ter­is­tics of the Light of Christ,” as Brin­ton did when he intro­duced it.

In the last few years it’s become pret­ty ubiq­ui­tous on Tik­Tok and oth­er short-form video (Dis­cov­er­ing Quak­ers, _gloyoyo_, itsmekat­evee).4 If you have five min­utes to tell a gen­er­al audi­ence about Quak­ers, bite-sized descrip­tions are impor­tant. Also: some of these con­tent cre­ators are prob­a­bly younger than the term itself. Also: I’ve final­ly grown into the Old Man Yelling at the Clouds meme. SPICES is here to stay.

Is SPICES all that ter­ri­ble? No, not real­ly. It can be handy. But it is pret­ty annoy­ing that we’ve con­fused a list of gener­ic val­ues for belief. And it’s super annoy­ing that even that list of val­ues is hemmed in by the require­ment that every com­po­nent fit into a sil­ly acronym.5

What’s fun­ny about the mys­tery of this is that there’s a very good chance that the per­son who first list­ed out SPICE is still around. There’s a box in some­one’s garage packed with late-1990s newslet­ters, one of which lists it out for the first time in print. Any­one with any infor­ma­tion can com­ment below or email me at martink@martinkelley.com.

Philadelphia YM on pamphlet series archive

April 14, 2022

I’ve already writ­ten about the dig­i­tal repub­li­ca­tion of the clas­sic William Penn Lec­ture series. But Philadel­phia Year­ly Meet­ing’s post con­tained this great quote from Jim Rose:

Pen­dle Hill had a prac­tice of ask­ing week-long stu­dents to take on a job on Wednes­day after­noon. One week my task was to clean/dust and arrange the books in the Upmeads library and in the process I found, high on an upper shelf, a whole series of dusty pam­phlets called the William Penn Lec­tures. Inac­ces­si­ble? You bet. A few months lat­er I sojourned at Pen­dle Hill while my late wife was tak­ing a week-long course. Dur­ing that week I sat with my com­put­er and scanned the text of those pam­phlets. My intent was to make that body of lit­er­a­ture more acces­si­ble to Quak­ers and oth­ers through­out the world on the inter­net. And recent­ly that goal has been achieved. 

I know Jim well from his time on Friends Jour­nal’s board of trustees and mak­ing Quak­er archives acces­si­ble is a great pas­sion of his. He helped us tremen­dous­ly in get­ting old­er arti­cles indexed. That com­bined with the Haver­ford Col­lege Library’s dig­i­tal­iza­tion of every­thing going back to 1955 means we’re rel­a­tive­ly acces­si­ble.

Speak­ing of archives, it looks like I’ve been remiss shar­ing anoth­er amaz­ing resource: the Salem (NJ) Quar­ter Tape Archive. Start­ing in the late 1970s, peo­ple start­ed tap­ing long inter­views with Friends. They’ve sat gath­er­ing dust until they were pulled out an dig­i­tized. Reg­u­lar read­ers will know I’m a huge fan of Rachel Davis DuBois and her inter­view by Charles Crabbe Thomas (num­ber 13) is absolute gold.

November Flashbacks

November 4, 2017

Once a month I’m doing flash­backs to past eras in my blog. 

One Year Ago: November 2016

A year ago the shock to the sys­tem was Trump’s elec­tion. One reac­tion of mine was a promise to blog more; I set up the sys­tem but I’m still not as fric­tion­less about it as I’d like. 

Wak­ing Up to Pres­i­dent Trump: We do not get to choose our era or the chal­lenges it throws at us. Only some­one with his­tor­i­cal amne­sia would say this is unprece­dent­ed in our his­to­ry. The enslave­ment of mil­lions and the geno­cide of mil­lions more are dark stains indeli­bly soaked into the very found­ing of the nation. But much will change, par­tic­u­lar­ly our naiv­i­ty and false opti­mism in an inevitable for­ward progress of our nation­al story. 

Five Years Ago: November 2012

Five years ago I wrote about how I had been blog­ging for fif­teen years. Do the math: it’s now 20 frig­ging years since I start­ed blogging.

Fif­teen Years of Blog­ging: I keep double-checking the math but it keeps adding up. In Novem­ber 1997 I added a fea­ture to my two-year-old peace web­site. I called this new enti­ty Non­vi­o­lence Web Upfront and updat­ed it week­ly with orig­i­nal fea­tures and curat­ed links to the best online paci­fist writ­ing. I wrote a ret­ro­spec­tive of the “ear­ly blog­ging days” in 2005 that talks about how it came about and gives some con­text about the proto-blogs hap­pen­ing back in 1997. 

Ten Years Ago: November 2007

Free­lanc­ing and work­ing the overnight shift at Shoprite, I won­dered if my Quak­er­ness was hope­less­ly use­less to my new circumstances.

Who are we part one (just what pam­phlet do I give the tat­tooed ex-con?): I love the fel­low who gave the mes­sage and I appre­ci­at­ed his min­istry. But the whole time I won­dered how this would sound to peo­ple I know now, like the friend­ly but hot-tempered Puer­to Rican ex-con less than a year out of a eight-year stint in fed­er­al prison, now work­ing two eight hour shifts at almost-minimum wage jobs and try­ing to stay out of trou­ble. How does the the­o­ry of our the­ol­o­gy fit into a code of con­duct that doesn’t start off assum­ing mid­dle class norms. 

Twenty Years Ago: November 1997

Four years before 9/11, I was ask­ing how we could break the cycle of terrorism.

How Come the U.S. Trains All the Ter­ror­ists?: It would seem a sim­ple case of U.S. mil­i­tarism com­ing home to roost, but it is not so sim­ple and it is not uncom­mon. Fol­low most trails of ter­ror­ism and you’ll find Unit­ed States gov­ern­ment fund­ing some­where in the recent past. 

Bring people to Christ / Leave them there

October 1, 2016
London Yearly Meeting, 1865.
Lon­don Year­ly Meet­ing, 1865.

It’s one of those quotes we fre­quent­ly hear: that George Fox said a min­is­ter’s job was “to bring peo­ple to Christ, and to leave them there.” But when I go to Google, I only find sec­ond­hand ref­er­ences, sand­wiched in quote marks but nev­er sourced. It turns up most fre­quent­ly in the works of British Friend William Pol­lard, who used it as kind of a catch phrase in his talks on “An Old Fash­ioned Quak­erism” from 1889. Sus­pi­cious­ly miss­ing is any search result from the jour­nal or epis­tles of Fox him­self. It’s pos­si­ble Pol­lard has para­phrased some­thing from Fox into a speech-friendly short­hand that Google miss­es, but it’s also pos­si­ble it’s one of those passed-down Fox myths like Pen­n’s sword.

So in mod­ern fash­ion, I posed the ques­tion to the Face­book hive mind. After great dis­cus­sions, I’m going to call this a half-truth. On the Face­book thread, Allis­tair Lomax shared a Fox epis­tle that con­vinces me the founder of Friends would have agreed with the basic concept:

I’m guess­ing it is para­phrase of a por­tion of Fox’s from epis­tle 308, 1674. Fox wrote “You know the man­ner of my life, the best part of thir­ty years since I went forth and for­sook all things. I sought not myself. I sought you and his glo­ry that sent me. When I turned you to him that is able to save you, I left you to him.”

Mark Wut­ka shared quo­ta­tions from Stephen Grel­let and William Williams which have con­vince me that it describes the “two step dance” of con­vince­ment for ear­ly Friends:

From Stephen Grel­let: “I have endeav­oured to lead this peo­ple to the Lord and to his Spir­it, and there is is safe to leave them.” And this from William Williams: “To per­suade peo­ple to seek the Lord, and to be faith­ful to his word, the inspo­ken words of the heart, is what we ought to do; and then leave them to be direct­ed by the inward feel­ings of the mind;”

The two-step image comes from Angela York Crane’s comment:

So it’s a two step dance. First, that who we are and how we live and speak turns oth­ers to the Lord, and sec­ond, that we trust enough to leave them there.

But: as a pithy catch phrase direct­ly attrib­uted to Fox it’s anoth­er myth. It per­haps bor­rowed some images from a mid-19th cen­tu­ry talk by Charles Spur­geon on George Fox, but came togeth­er in the 1870s as a cen­tral catch phrase of British reformer Friend William Pol­lard. Pol­lard is a fas­ci­nat­ing fig­ure in his own right, an ear­ly pro­po­nent of mod­ern lib­er­al­ism in a Lon­don Year­ly Meet­ing that was then large­ly evan­gel­i­cal and mis­sion­ary. Even his pam­phlet and book titles were telling, includ­ing Prim­i­tive Chris­tian­i­ty Revived and A Rea­son­able Faith. He had an agen­da and this phrase was a key for­mu­la­tion of his argu­ment and vision.

He is hard­ly the first or last Friend to have lift­ed an inci­den­tal phrase or con­cept of George Fox’s and giv­en it the weight of a mod­ern tenet (“That of God” springs to mind). More inter­est­ing to me is that Pol­lard’s work was fre­quent­ly reprint­ed and ref­er­enced in Friends Intel­li­gencer, the Amer­i­can Hick­site pub­li­ca­tion (and pre­de­ces­sor of Friends Jour­nal), at a time when Lon­don Friends did­n’t rec­og­nize Hick­sites as legit­i­mate Quak­ers. His vision of an “Old Fash­ioned Quak­erism” rein­cor­po­rat­ed qui­etism and sought to bring British Friends back to a two-step con­vince­ment prac­tice. It paved the way for the trans­for­ma­tion of British Quak­erism fol­low­ing the trans­for­ma­tion­al 1895 Man­ches­ter Con­fer­ence and gave Amer­i­can Friends inter­est­ed in mod­ern lib­er­al philo­soph­i­cal ideals a blue­print for incor­po­rat­ing them into a Quak­er framework.

The phrase “bring peo­ple to Christ/leave them there” is a com­pelling image that has lived on in the 130 or so odd years since its coinage. I sus­pect it is still used much as Pol­lard intend­ed: as a qui­etist brak­ing sys­tem for top-down mis­sion­ary pro­grams. It’s a great con­cept. Only our tes­ti­mo­ny in truth now requires that we intro­duce it, “As William Pol­lard said, a Quak­er min­is­ter’s job is to…”

And for those won­der­ing, yes, I have just ordered Pol­lard’s Old Fash­ioned Quak­erism via Vin­tage Quak­er Books. He seems like some­thing of a kin­dred spir­it and I want to learn more.

Who are we part one (just what pamphlet do I give the tattooed ex-con?)

November 10, 2007

If you cycle through my last few months of com­ments, you’ll see that I’ve been spend­ing a lot of time think­ing about who “we” Friends are and who we serve and the con­se­quent ques­tion of why we orga­nize into local meet­ings, nation­al affil­i­a­tions, blogs, etc.

Essen­tial to this think­ing has been Jeanne B’s Social Class and Quak­ers blog. There are many ways to tease out the way cul­ture and faith work to rein­force and sab­o­tage one anoth­er, but class is a good one. If you trav­el from one the­o­log­i­cal brand of Friends to anoth­er, from one cul­tur­al zone to anoth­er (e.g, urban vs ex-urban vs rur­al) you’ll see marked cul­ture dif­fer­ences. Just take a look at the potluck array if you doubt me. Jeanne talks about the urban lib­er­al Quak­er stig­ma against Cool Whip and a great link she turned me on to talks about some of the ways the alterna-lefty cul­ture can unwit­ting­ly sep­a­rate itself from poten­tial allies in social change over tofu (update: more recent work from this orga­ni­za­tion can be found at clas​sism​.org).

Since falling out of the rar­efied world of pro­fes­sion­al Quak­erism a year ago, I’ve become more local. I live in a small, large­ly agri­cul­tur­al town in rur­al South Jer­sey rough­ly equidis­tant from the region’s sky­scraper metropoli (I don’t give its name for pri­va­cy rea­sons) and res­i­dents range from multi-generational fam­i­lies to Mex­i­can farm­work­ers to peo­ple who got in trou­ble up north in NYC and are look­ing for a qui­eter place to come clean. I don’t see Quak­ers in my day-to-day life any­more but I do inter­act with a more rep­re­sen­ta­tive sam­pling of Amer­i­ca, peo­ple who are all try­ing to get some­where oth­er than where they are. Jesus would have been here. Fox would have preached here. But what do mod­ern lib­er­al Friends have to say about this world? As Bill Samuel wrote on Jean­ne’s blog issues of safety-net pub­lic assis­tance that seem like do-gooder caus­es for most well-off lib­er­al Friends are mat­ters of per­son­al prac­ti­cal­i­ty for more eco­nom­i­cal­ly diverse reli­gious bod­ies (the child care pro­gram that Pres­i­dent Bush vetoed last month is the same one that let me take my fevered two year old to the doc­tor last Friday).

Last First Day I heard a good ortho­dox piece of Quak­er min­istry couched in a learned lan­guage, all talk of jus­ti­fi­ca­tion ver­sus sanc­ti­fi­ca­tion, with a bit of insid­er Quak­er acronyms thrown in for good effect. I love the fel­low who gave the mes­sage and I appre­ci­at­ed his min­istry. But the whole time I won­dered how this would sound to peo­ple I know now, like the friend­ly but hot-tempered Puer­to Rican ex-con less than a year out of a eight-year stint in fed­er­al prison, now work­ing two eight hour shifts at almost-minimum wage jobs and try­ing to stay out of trou­ble. How does the the­o­ry of our the­ol­o­gy fit into a code of con­duct that does­n’t start off assum­ing mid­dle class norms. What do our tofu cov­ered dish­es and vanil­la soy chai’s (I’m so addict­ed) have to do with liv­ing under Christ’s instruc­tion? And just which FGC out­reach pam­phlet should I be hand­ing my new friend?

Enough for now. More soon.

Betsy Cazden’s new site

January 5, 2007

I’m pleased to announce that my lat­est free­lance project has just launched: Betsy​Caz​den​.com. There’s noth­ing par­tic­u­lar­ly rev­o­lu­tion­ary about the tech­nol­o­gy behind the site or its design, but the Quak­er geek in me is so hap­py to see it. Long-term read­ers will remem­ber my excit­ed post Fel­low­ship Mod­el of Lib­er­al Quak­ers, writ­ten after read­ing Bet­sy’s Bea­con Hill Friends pam­phlet Fel­low­ships, Con­fer­ences, and Asso­ci­a­tions. Bet­sy is one of the small num­ber of Quak­er his­to­ri­ans will­ing to take on con­tem­po­rary his­to­ry and her obser­va­tions can be quite insight­ful. I hope she’ll find an even wider audi­ence with this site and the blog that she plans to add soon.