Origin of the Quaker SPICES testimonies

December 20, 2025

If you ask about Quak­er beliefs these days, one of the com­mon answers you’ll get is SPICE, a handy acronym that holds togeth­er a hodge­podge of val­ues, name­ly: sim­plic­i­ty, peace, integri­ty, com­mu­ni­ty and equal­i­ty (and lat­er sus­tain­abil­i­ty to become SPICES). One Quak­er school defin­i­tive­ly puts it, “Quak­ers agree to a core set of val­ues, known as tes­ti­monies.” I’ve not found SPICES list­ed before 2000 and even many of the indi­vid­ual com­po­nents are absent from old­er books of Faith and Practice.

The ques­tion of where this ubiq­ui­tous acronym came from, and when, reg­u­lar­ly comes up in Quak­er dis­course (most­ly recent­ly on Red­dit here). I some­times answer with the bits I’ve dug up but rather than rein­vent­ing the wheel each time, I thought I’d write it all down. I invite peo­ple to add what they know in com­ments and I’ll edit this.

1940s

Howard Brin­ton was the inven­tor of our mod­ern idea of a “tes­ti­mo­ny” in the 1940s, and his orig­i­nal list was com­mu­ni­ty, har­mo­ny, equal­i­ty, and sim­plic­i­ty. He was the Philadelphia-area born Friend who helped orga­nize unpro­grammed Friends on the U.S. West Coast in the ear­ly part of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry. Brin­ton had a knack for sim­ple expla­na­tions that expressed the emerg­ing con­sen­sus of a new gen­er­a­tion of Friends who were heal­ing from the nineteenth-century schisms. Find­ing new ways of talk­ing about our com­mon­al­i­ties was a cen­tral part of the work of rec­on­cil­i­a­tion. From his tour de force 1952 mas­ter­piece, Friends for 300 Years:

The mean­ing of the group in Quak­er prac­tice can be sug­gest­ed by a dia­gram. Light from God streams down into the wait­ing group. This Light, if the way is open for it, pro­duces three results: uni­ty, knowl­edge, and pow­er. As a result we have the kind of behav­ior which exists as an ide­al in a meet­ing for wor­ship and a meet­ing for busi­ness. Because of the char­ac­ter­is­tics of the Light of Christ, the result­ing behav­ior can be described in a gen­er­al way by the four words Com­mu­ni­ty, Har­mo­ny, Equal­i­ty, and Sim­plic­i­ty.…

He includ­ed a chart, which hon­est­ly does­n’t help much with my under­stand­ing of the meta­physics of it all.

1975

Read­er Tomas Mario Kalmar sent me a paper called Learn­ing Com­mu­ni­ty pre­pared by the Edu­ca­tion Com­mis­sion of Aus­tralian Year­ly Meet­ing that lists six “char­ac­ter­is­tics that dis­tin­guished Quak­er edu­ca­tion”: a reli­gious­ly guard­ed edu­ca­tion, com­mu­ni­ty, non-violence, equal­i­ty, sim­plic­i­ty, and an expe­ri­en­tial cur­ricu­lum. The list is large­ly based on Howard Brin­ton’s work but I include it here because it shows how Friends were remix­ing and repur­pos­ing his list. Learn­ing Com­mu­ni­ty actu­al­ly looks pret­ty good and fair­ly time­less and Tomas gave me per­mis­sion to repost the PDF here.

1980 – 90s

In a Red­dit thread a few years ago, macoafi wrote: “My in-laws were chil­dren in first day school in the 1980s and 1990s, and they learned 4 tes­ti­monies, no acronym. (Peace, truth, sim­plic­i­ty, equal­i­ty).” At some point Brin­ton’s har­mo­ny start­ed being called peace so this is most­ly his list except for truth being swapped for com­mu­ni­ty.

1981

Com­menter Sharon writes:

I first heard SPICE at the 1981 FGC gath­er­ing in Berea KY! At the time it didn’t sit well with me as I found it too glib. I was still work­ing out what God want­ed my life to tes­ti­fy too.

This would put it near­ly two decades before from any doc­u­ment­ed instance I’ve seen. It is also well before any instance I’ve seen that includ­ed an I for integri­ty. I admit I’ll remain skep­ti­cal until I see fur­ther evi­dence, though it is pos­si­ble that some­one remem­bered it from the Berea gath­er­ing and start­ed reusing it in the last 1990s.1

1990

Wilmer Coop­er was an Ohio Wilbu­rite Friend who went on to become first dean of Earl­ham School of Reli­gion upon its found­ing in 1960. Thir­ty years lat­er he pub­lished A Liv­ing Faith, which was built on an ESR course called Basic Quak­er Beliefs. In the pref­ace he writes: “It is my hope that this work will help Friends gain a fuller under­stand­ing of their Quak­er her­itage and the­o­log­i­cal roots, while pro­vid­ing for non-Quakers a com­pre­hen­sive answer to the ques­tions: ‘Who are the Quak­ers?’ and “What is Quak­erism?’ ” In its final chap­ter Coop­er has two lists, which each have four tes­ti­monies. His reli­gious tes­ti­monies are:

  • belief that we can have direct and imme­di­ate access to the liv­ing God;
  • we can no only know the will of God but can, by God’s grace, be enabled to do the will of God.
  • the Quak­er expe­ri­ence of of com­mu­ni­ty as expressed in the “gath­ered meeting.”
  • the sacra­men­tal view of life.

His social tes­ti­monies are:

  • Peace Tes­ti­mo­ny
  • sim­plic­i­ty
  • equal­i­ty
  • integri­ty

He expands to give a para­graph to each of his eight tes­ti­monies but obvi­ous­ly the sec­ond list is much pithi­er.2. He does say that this isn’t a canon­i­cal list, that dif­fer­ent Friends will have dif­fer­ent lists, and con­cludes the sec­tion on tes­ti­monies by, well, tes­ti­fy­ing: “Friends believe deeply that if they sub­mit them­selves to God and live by the Light of Christ they will be enabled to live by the truth of the Gospel.” It’s worth not­ing that the lat­er SPICE/S for­mu­la­tion did­n’t include any of the reli­gious ones (you could per­haps try to claim com­mu­ni­ty der­vices from his reli­gious tes­ti­monies list but I don’t gen­er­al­ly hear the SPICES C described in the kind of spir­i­tu­al lan­guage Coop­er used).

The next year Coop­er wrote a Pen­dle Hill pam­phlet that focused on integri­ty. As far as I’ve seen Coop­er is the first to include an I for integri­ty, set­ting the stage for our famil­iar acronym.

Mid-1990s

My wife Julie insists that she remem­bers talk of SPICE/S back when she was in high school start­ing to get involved with Friends (cir­ca 1994). She did­n’t attend a Quak­er school so this would have been in Philadel­phia Year­ly Meet­ing cir­cles, prob­a­bly specif­i­cal­ly South Jersey.

Late 1990s

In a com­ment to this very post, Pen­dle Hill edi­tor Jana­ki Spickard Keel­er says that when she was work­ing a 2023 pam­phlet with Paul Buck­ley, they tracked SPICE/S to a Friends Coun­cil for Edu­ca­tion list­serv for edu­ca­tors (per­haps E‑Quakes, which was start­ed in 1996 accord­ing to a FCE his­to­ry). Jana­ki writes: “No one came for­ward as being the first to come up with the idea, but they shared it along them­selves and it spread. They esti­mate this hap­pened around 1998.” The pam­phlet quotes Tom Hoopes, who start­ed as direc­tor of edu­ca­tion for Philadel­phia Year­ly Meet­ing in 1998: “I encoun­tered it in use by one of the month­ly meet­ings of Philadel­phia Year­ly Meet­ing, and I thought to myself, ‘what a great mnemon­ic device for help­ing peo­ple to remem­ber what we Quak­ers claim to pri­or­i­tize, and to try to prac­tice!’” Tom told Jana­ki and Paul that he did­n’t remem­ber the iden­ti­ty of the Friends meeting.

1999

The Sum­mer 1999 edi­tion of Salem Quar­ter (N.J.) News reports that Wood­stown Meet­ing cre­at­ed a SPICE rap in for a First-day School pro­gram which also includ­ed songs from Spice Girls. Yes it’s as unique as it sounds:

What’s the word? SPICE!!!! What’s the word? SPICE IS THE WAY TO GO!!!!
Sim­plic­i­ty is sim­ple, and you know it’s right. Squan­derin’ mon­ey gets ya into a fight.
Peace, it rules, and you know that it’s true. It’s the thing I need to get along with you. Don’t yell and sing those fight­in’ songs, when you can help oth­ers and right their wrongs.
Integri­ty is always bein’ true to your word. It’s the most hon­est tes­ti­mo­ny I’ve ever heard.
Livin’ and a‑sharin’ all together’s real­ly fun. Com­mu­ni­ty is helpin’, workin’, playin’ all in one.
Equal­i­ty means every­one is equal, and that’s cool.
Respect­ing oth­er is what’s right and is the gold­en rule!!

Note that the arti­cle gives a clue on source: “After read­ing a short arti­cle in Philadel­phia Year­ly Meet­ing News with the acronym SPICE high­light­ing the tes­ti­monies… [we] were inspired to incor­po­rate this into our First Day School Pro­gram at Wood­stown MM.” The old­est copy of PYM News avail­able via Archive​.org is tan­ta­liz­ing­ly close — Nov/December 1999. That seems to be when PYM start­ed post­ing its newslet­ter.3

2003

Google finds a PDF of a 2003 talk giv­en to a Uni­tar­i­an Uni­ver­sal­ist church by Salt Lake City Friend Diana Lee Hirschi in 2003 talk­ing about SPICE. 

2004

I myself first com­plained about SPICE in 2004 (note it had­n’t got­ten a sec­ond S yet). I com­plained that this kind of list of sec­u­lar tes­ti­monies were too restric­tive. I real­ly was a Quak­er Ranter back then; also I was real­ly kind of hard on Brin­ton, who I appre­ci­ate more now.

2006

I like to search the Friends Jour­nal archives to see when new terms show up. New terms are often bandied about by par­tic­u­lar Friends or with­in sub-groups, where they might cir­cu­late for a few years with­out get­ting into wider usage. As far as I’ve been able to deter­mine, the first ref­er­ence to SPICES in Friends Jour­nal is a 2006 arti­cle by Har­ri­ett Heath titled “The Quak­er Par­ent­ing Project: A Report.” She’s lays it out as an attempt to teach Quak­er chil­dren with­out resort­ing to dogma:

There are sev­er­al dif­fer­ent lists of tes­ti­monies. We start­ed with one com­mon­ly referred to by the acronym SPICES: Sim­plic­i­ty, Peace, Integri­ty, Com­mu­ni­ty, Equal­i­ty, and Stew­ard­ship — but we found that there were oth­er issues not addressed by this list. Ser­vice is an inte­gral part of Quak­erism in our efforts to live our faith; should it be a tes­ti­mo­ny? Edu­ca­tion has been his­tor­i­cal­ly an inte­gral part of Quak­er­sim; should it, too, be includ­ed? Where does wor­ship — time set apart — fit in?

Her project even­tu­al­ly picked a dif­fer­ent list because they did­n’t want to be bound by the dic­tates of fit­ting into an acronym. They includ­ed con­flict and growth and ser­vice (which some­times is list­ed as the final S).

2007/2008 videos

In 2007, British Friends could pro­duce a video called “The Quak­er Tes­ti­monies” that did­n’t men­tion SPICE/S and ranged over oth­er non-acronymed tes­ti­monies such as one for respect and anoth­er against oath-taking. If you lis­ten care­ful­ly, I think at least one of the speak­ers must have heard of SPICE because he seemed to be orga­niz­ing thoughts around it. 

In 2008 I talked about SPICE and spir­i­tu­al­ly get­ting deep­er with tes­ti­monies in a YouTube video and accom­pa­ny­ing blog post.

2009

Brin­ton schol­ar Antho­ny Manousos did a deep dive on SPICES. Although Antho­ny claims Briton invent­ed SPICES per se, I think he just invent­ed the idea of tes­ti­monies and the ini­tial list that includ­ed three of them (four if you count the harmony/peace change).

2011

Less than two years after Heath’s arti­cle, Mark Dansereau and Kim Tso­canos, the co-heads of Con­necti­cut Friends School in Wilton, Conn., pub­lished an anno­tat­ed list of SPICES in Friends Jour­nal, explain­ing that their school was built on these “Six Quak­er Val­ues” (yes, ital­i­cized and cap­i­tal­ized) and that they applied and wove them into each activ­i­ty in their cur­ric­u­la. This might be one of the old­est fully-intact list­ings still eas­i­ly avail­able on the web. This has become one of the most vis­it­ed pages on Friends Jour­nal website.

2012

By this time SPICE/S was becom­ing ubiq­ui­tous. See this blog post from North­west Year­ly Meet­ing and a video Brent Bill put togeth­er to pro­mote an upcom­ing intro­duc­to­ry work­shop at his meet­ing in Indiana.

Paul Buck­ley gave a talk in 2012 that high­light­ed the role of Wilmer Coop­er, an Ohio Friend per­haps most well remem­bered for found­ing Earl­ham School of Reli­gion in 1960. In 2023, Paul Buck­ley wrote a pam­phlet from Pen­dle Hill, Quak­er Tes­ti­mo­ny: What We Wit­ness to the World, edit­ed by Jana­ki Spickard Keel­er, dur­ing which they deter­mined the late 1990s date.

2013

Some­one around 2006 I was stand­ing in a meal line at a Quak­er event with Cal­i­for­nia Friend Eric Moon and we start­ed to talk about tes­ti­monies. It was the start of a great con­ver­sa­tion, cut short by some inter­rup­tion or anoth­er before we even hit the dessert sta­tion. When I start­ed as Friends Jour­nal edi­tor I asked him to write some­thing. 2013’s Cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly Not the Tes­ti­monies was the result. We also talked in an ear­ly Quak­er Author Pod­cast.


So where did the SPICES for­mu­la­tion come from? It ulti­mate­ly derived from Brin­ton’s list, with har­mo­ny mor­ph­ing to peace and WIl Coop­er’s integri­ty adding an I. Giv­en its ped­a­gog­i­cal nature, it was prob­a­bly coined by edu­ca­tors. It’s a good teach­ing tool, easy to remem­ber and some­thing you can eas­i­ly weave into a multi-week class. 

Since there’s noth­ing par­tic­u­lar­ly reli­gious about the SPICE/S list, it can work in an essen­tial­ly sec­u­lar envi­ron­ment that might be aller­gic to religious-sounding Quak­er the­ol­o­gy. This would include Friends schools appeal­ing to a non-Quaker audi­ence or a Lib­er­al Friends Meet­ing that wants some­thing non-controversial to teach the kids. I nev­er hear any­one talk about it being derived from “char­ac­ter­is­tics of the Light of Christ,” as Brin­ton did when he intro­duced it.

In the last few years it’s become pret­ty ubiq­ui­tous on Tik­Tok and oth­er short-form video (Dis­cov­er­ing Quak­ers, _gloyoyo_, itsmekat­evee).4 If you have five min­utes to tell a gen­er­al audi­ence about Quak­ers, bite-sized descrip­tions are impor­tant. Also: some of these con­tent cre­ators are prob­a­bly younger than the term itself. Also: I’ve final­ly grown into the Old Man Yelling at the Clouds meme. SPICES is here to stay.

Is SPICES all that ter­ri­ble? No, not real­ly. It can be handy. But it is pret­ty annoy­ing that we’ve con­fused a list of gener­ic val­ues for belief. And it’s super annoy­ing that even that list of val­ues is hemmed in by the require­ment that every com­po­nent fit into a sil­ly acronym.5

What’s fun­ny about the mys­tery of this is that there’s a very good chance that the per­son who first list­ed out SPICE is still around. There’s a box in some­one’s garage packed with late-1990s newslet­ters, one of which lists it out for the first time in print. Any­one with any infor­ma­tion can com­ment below or email me at martink@martinkelley.com.

Standing with the Marginalized, with Anthony Manousos)

September 22, 2025

This week I talked with my old Friend Antho­ny Manousos about the [waves hand in the air] polit­i­cal sit­u­a­tion we’re in. I’ve known Antho­ny for over 28 years now, back when we were part of a con­fer­ence to try to kick-start what lat­er was reborn as Quak­er Vol­un­tary Ser­vice (spoil­er: our attempt failed for what I think were most­ly gen­er­a­tional issues). Antho­ny is still protest­ing and wit­ness­ing to make a bet­ter world. I loved hear­ing his sto­ry of coali­tion work and the joy of orga­niz­ing with music. His arti­cle, “We Have No King,” appears in this mon­th’s Friends Jour­nal

I asked him what Quak­ers bring to protests:

One of the impor­tant things that we bring is our way of wor­ship. And our way of wor­ship helps to bring the tem­per­a­ture down. I think what the cur­rent regime wants is a vio­lent move­ment oppos­ing them. That plays out what they want (and cer­tain­ly the assas­si­na­tion of Char­lie Kirk plays into that sce­nario). What Quak­ers bring is a com­mit­ment to peace­ful protest. And when we’re around, we can be that strong, com­mit­ted, peace­ful pres­ence. And that’s important.

I also asked him a follow-up ques­tion of what we need to do to get out of the way and accept the lead­er­ship of oth­ers in social change. You can lis­ten to his answers or read them in the show notes

Tread and Trample

July 26, 2025

Over on Red­dit, a dis­cus­sion try­ing to square our oft-quoted advice to see “that of God” with the arrival of secret police on U.S. streets.

I don’t think Quak­ers’ his­tor­i­cal mem­o­ry always serves us very well. In 1656, George Fox wrote a let­ter from Launce­s­ton Gaol, a por­tion of which is quot­ed in every edi­tion of Faith and Prac­tice. It’s been repro­duced as giant posters and the key phrase has become one of the go-to ele­va­tor pitch­es for mod­ern Friends. It tells us to “be pat­terns” and “walk cheer­ful­ly over the world, answer­ing that of God in every one; where­by in them ye may be a bless­ing, and make the wit­ness of God in them to bless you: then to the Lord God you shall be a sweet savour, and a blessing.”

We’ve tak­en one para­graph from one let­ter as a mis­sion state­ment and now we get peo­ple wring­ing their hands try­ing to rec­on­cile this Pollyanna-style nice­ness with the hor­ror we see in the world. You get Friends valiant­ly try­ing (and most­ly fail­ing) to see “that of God” in ICE agents, ter­ror­ists, or author­i­tar­i­an polit­i­cal leaders.

I think a big part of the prob­lem is that Quak­ers have over­all been a com­fort­able, well-off peo­ple for a long time. We’ve spent much of the last 300 years most­ly remem­ber­ing the happy-feeling stuff. Fox and his fel­low ear­ly Friends were wary of “the world,” see­ing it as a fall­en place that we could tran­scend only with the guid­ance and heal­ing pow­ers of the Liv­ing Christ. Yes, he talked about being pat­terns in that let­ter, but way down. The let­ter actu­al­ly start­ed off in a thun­der­ous man­ner that quite frankly, I think per­haps speaks more clear­ly to our time:

Dwell in the pow­er of life and wis­dom, and dread of the Lord of life, and of heav­en and earth, that you may be pre­served in the wis­dom of God over all, and be a ter­ror and a dread to all the adver­saries of God, answer­ing that of God in them all, spread­ing the truth abroad, awak­en­ing the wit­ness, con­found­ing the deceit, gath­er­ing up out of trans­gres­sion into the life, into the covenant of light and peace with God. Let all nations hear the sound by word or by writ­ing. Spare no place, spare no tongue, nor pen; but be obe­di­ent to the Lord God. Go through the work, and be valiant for the truth upon earth; tread and tram­ple down all that is contrary.

None of this is prac­ti­cal advice for what to do if you see secret police jump out of unmarked van to kid­nap some­one off the street. But what if our edi­tions of Faith and Prac­tice all advised us to a ter­ror and dread and to walk the earth tread­ing and tram­pling on all that is con­trary to divine love? Toward the end of the let­ter, Fox advised us to “be obe­di­ent to the pow­er, for that will save you out of the hands of unrea­son­able men and pre­serve you over the world to him­self.” May it be so.

Oth­er com­men­taries: Simon St. Lau­rent (2007), Stu­art Mas­ters (2016), Mark Wut­ka (2018) and Lewis Ben­son’s bril­liant 1970 essay “ ‘That of God’: What Did George Fox Mean by It?” Also, John Andrew Gallery has a recent Pen­dle Hill pam­phlet on the essay, which I haven’t read but assume is worth reading.

Update: in the Red­dit dis­cus­sion Kei­thB said that he won­dered if there were Quak­ers out there look­ing for jus­ti­fi­ca­tion to tan­gle it up with ICE offi­cers. Pret­ty much as we were talk­ing, word came out that the son of well-known Philly-area Quak­er fam­i­ly being arrest­ed at his home in Port­land, Ore­gon, on sus­pi­cions of par­tic­i­pat­ing in vio­lent anti-ICE protests a few weeks ago.

The pros­e­cu­tors have released a bunch of pic­tures of vio­lent activ­i­ty being per­pe­trat­ed by some­one who looks like the accused, with a sim­i­lar arm tat­too. That pro­tes­tor used a stop sign as a bat­ter­ing ram, and then threw a brick at an ICE agent that hit his head, drew blood, and required med­ical atten­tion. I sure hope it’s not a Quak­er in those pho­tos and that his defense attor­neys can prove it. Tread and tram­pling is not a license for assault.

Navigating Gender Transition as a Quaker

July 13, 2025

New from Quak­er­S­peak, an inter­view with Willa Taber:

Joy was my guide­post through my tran­si­tion,” Willa reflects. “I real­ized that at the age of 70, I was too old to post­pone joy. I real­ized short­ly after that that at four years old, I was too old to post­pone joy, but I didn’t know it then.

Willa was one of the reg­u­lar Quak­er blog­gers back in the day6. I had most­ly lost touch, only hear­ing third hand of the tran­si­tion some­where. I’m glad she’s doing well and still wit­ness­ing to the Truth as revealed to her.

Faith and practice, language and witness

December 15, 2020

From Steven Davi­son:

I car­ry a min­istry that forms a recur­ring theme in this blog: that our social wit­ness min­utes ought to express our Quak­er faith explic­it­ly as the heart of our tes­ti­mo­ni­al rhetoric. In my expe­ri­ence, they rarely do. Instead they use the mind­set and rhetoric of social change non­prof­its. They employ argu­ments from sci­ence and social sci­ence, and use sta­tis­tics, rather than a straight­for­ward­ly moral argu­ment. Very often, you would nev­er know a reli­gious orga­ni­za­tion had writ­ten them, let alone a Quak­er meeting. 

In his post he rewrites a recent minute on cli­mate change. It’s an inter­est­ing experiment.

I must admit I’ve rolled my eyes more than once over min­utes. I remem­ber one some years back that went into detail about pro­posed mis­sile sys­tems and the minu­tia of glob­al nuclear deter­rence pol­i­cy (my mem­o­ry is that it was writ­ten by a high school math teacher but that might be an embell­ish­ment). I had no qualms about the min­ute’s argu­ments, which I thought were quite sound and well-reasoned. But I seri­ous­ly won­dered who the audi­ence was sup­posed to be. Did the Friends approv­ing the minute real­ly think this was going to go up the chain of com­mand to to upper ech­e­lons of the Pen­ta­gon, the House Com­mit­tee on Defense, etc? “Gen­er­al, sir, we have a minute from some Quak­ers you must read right away!”

I’ve writ­ten polit­i­cal blogs and I like ana­lyz­ing poli­cies. I can make informed sec­u­lar argu­ments about cli­mate change and mil­i­tarism. Stay­ing on top of sci­en­tif­ic changes and under­stand­ing the effects of gov­ern­men­tal poli­cies is impor­tant for us. But it’s not the source of our col­lec­tive pow­er as Friends. Peo­ple look to us for our moral clar­i­ty, which (when we actu­al­ly pos­sess it) is a result of our spir­i­tu­al ground­ing. Mis­siles are wrong because threat­en­ing to kill peo­ple is wrong. Design­ing weapons capa­ble of war crimes is wrong because mass mur­der is wrong. These are sim­ple state­ments. They are sure to be con­sid­ered naive by those who only think of poli­cies. But they can speak to oth­ers (“speak to that of God in them”) who can feel their truth in their heart.

The Doctrine of Discovery, white guilt, and Friends

November 2, 2018

Johan Mau­r­er starts with “it’s com­pli­cat­ed” and goes on from there. A pas­sage I find par­tic­u­lar­ly inter­est­ing is his expla­na­tion of why look­ing at large-scale state-level atroc­i­ties like the steal­ing of native land or the kid­nap­ping of mil­lions of Africans is not just some­thing to be done out of guilt:

Whether you believe in an intel­li­gent Satan (along the lines of Peter Wag­n­er’s ideas) or a more imper­son­al mech­a­nism of demon­ic evil (Wal­ter Wink), we should­n’t pre­tend that such nodes just go away. Their evil per­sists. The basis for apol­o­gy and repen­tance is not white guilt or shame or any form of self-flagellation. Instead, it is to con­duct spir­i­tu­al war­fare against the demons of racism and oppres­sion and false wit­ness, to declare them off-limits in the land that we now share, so that we can con­duct our future stew­ard­ship — and make our pub­lic invest­ments— in free­dom and mutu­al regard. 

I’m drawn to the old notion of “The Tempter” as a force that leads us to do what’s per­son­al­ly reward­ing rather than moral­ly just. I think it explains a lot of inter­nal strug­gles I’ve faced, even in sim­ple wit­ness­es. As Johan says, these mas­sive injus­tices can’t just be undone but they need to be rec­og­nized for the immen­si­ty of their scale. I’ve also seen this weird way in which pro­gres­sive whites can blithe­ly dis­re­gard Native Amer­i­can per­spec­tives on these issues. Lis­ten­ing more and wait­ing for com­pli­cat­ed answers seems essen­tial in my opinion.

Anoth­er good deep-dive for Friends inter­est­ed in this is Bet­sy Caz­den’s Friends Jour­nal 2006 arti­cle, Quak­er Mon­ey, Old Mon­ey, and White Priv­i­lege. It’s one I turn to every so often to remind myself of some of our monied Quak­er norms. Johan gives a pass to William Penn but I think it’s impor­tant to remem­ber that his colo­nial ambi­tions were deeply enmeshed in at least three dif­fer­ent wars and con­ve­nient­ly served the polit­i­cal cal­cu­la­tions of two empires, the per­fect storm of an oppor­tu­ni­ty for a group of paci­fist idealists.

https://​blog​.canyoube​lieve​.me/​2​0​1​8​/​1​1​/​q​u​a​k​e​r​s​-​a​n​d​-​n​a​t​i​v​e​-​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​n​s​-​i​t​s​.​h​tml

Reviving Quakerism in the New Millennium

April 29, 2018

Reviv­ing Quak­erism in the New Millennium

What are our truths? What do we believe as a com­mu­ni­ty? What is our wit­ness in the world today? How are we build­ing the Beloved King­dom here on Earth? Quak­erism is not a do-it-yourself indi­vid­u­al­is­tic reli­gion. If it is, why do we even come to Meet­ing for Wor­ship anymore? 

View at Medi​um​.com

Is our Quaker Peace Testimony an historical artifact or a living witness to our faith?

March 14, 2018

Is our Quak­er Peace Tes­ti­mo­ny an his­tor­i­cal arti­fact or a liv­ing wit­ness to our faith?

If we aren’t liv­ing our faith, then the 1660 Peace Tes­ti­mo­ny is sim­ply an his­tor­i­cal arti­fact. Like the old musty books in our Meet­ing library that sit behind glass, most­ly unread. They look impres­sive and make us feel good about our­selves, but if we don’t read them and take the words to heart, they might as well be wall paper.